J.; Clinical presentation and prognosis of left main coronary artery disease in the 1980s. Eur Heart J. 12 1991:495-502.
J.; Prognostic value of lead aVR in patients with a first non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 108 2003:814-819.
T.; Combined prognostic utility of ST segment in lead aVR and troponin T on admission in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 97 2006:334-339.
R.M.; Utility of lead aVR for identifying the culprit lesion in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 14 2009:219-225.
B.M.; Relationship of ST elevation in lead aVR with angiographic findings and outcome in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 154 2007:71-78.
M.; Value of lead aVR in predicting acute occlusion of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery and in-hospital outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an electrocardiographic predictor of poor prognosis. J Electrocardiol. 41 2008:335-341.
S.; Prediction of significant left main coronary artery stenosis by the 12-lead electrocardiogram in patients with rest angina pectoris and the withholding of clopidogrel therapy. Am J Cardiol. 92 2003:846-848.
R.; Value of the electrocardiogram in diagnosing the number of severely narrowed coronary arteries in rest angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 72 1993:999-1003.
G.; Admission ST-segment elevation in lead aVR as the factor improving complex risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Emerg Med. 26 2008:408-412.
S.; Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V(1). J Am Coll Cardiol. 38 2001:1348-1354.
J.T.; ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 40 2002:1531-1540.
A.; ST segment elevation in lead aVR during exercise testing is associated with LAD stenosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 34 2007:338-345.
M., Tolga Kocum
A.; Exercise-induced ST-segment elevation in leads aVR and V1 for the prediction of left main disease. Int J Cardiol. 128 2008:240-243.
M.H.; Unconventional electrocardiographic signs of ischemia during exercise testing. Am J Cardiol. 102 2008:949-953.
O.O.; Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 14 2007:e39-e60.
R.J.; Identification of severe coronary artery disease in patients with a single abnormal coronary territory on exercise thallium-201 imaging: the importance of clinical and exercise variables. J Am Coll Cardiol. 35 2000:335-344.
D.L.; Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 44 1988:837-845.
D.K.; Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices. Stat Med. 16 1997:1529-1542.
L.B.; General problems in medical decision making with comments on ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 8 1978:299-306.
H.; Identification of severe and extensive coronary artery disease by automatic measurement of transient ischemic dilation of the left ventricle in dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Am Coll Cardiol. 27 1996:1612-1620.
J.M.; Prevalence of high-risk thallium-201 scintigraphic findings in left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison with patients with multiple- and single-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 53 1984:462-469.
W.Y.; Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 30 1997:1641-1648.
J.J.; Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 49 2007:1109-1127.
H.; AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 119 2009:e262-e270.
J.R.; Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 14 2007:455-465.
M.B.; Quantitative myocardial-perfusion SPECT: comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages. J Nucl Cardiol. 15 2008:27-34.
M.; Single photon-emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 17 2010:941-973.
B.H.; ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol. 42 2003:1318-1333.
H.; Details of coronary stenosis morphology influence its hemodynamic severity and distal flow reserve. Circulation. 80 1989:636-642.
J.W.; Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 53 1976:627-632.