0
Back To Top Jump Location
Sign In  | Cart
Left Shadow
Right Shadow
Original research |

Atrial Dilation and Altered Function Are Mediated by Age and Diastolic Function But Not Before the Eighth Decade FREE

Anita C. Boyd, BMedSc Hons; Nelson B. Schiller, MD; Dominic Leung, MBBS, PhD; David L. Ross, MBBS; Liza Thomas, MBBS, PhD
[+] Author Information

The authors have reported that they have no relationships to disclose.Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Liza Thomas, Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Sydney, New South Wales 2070, Australia

American College of Cardiology Foundation

J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4(3):234-242. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.11.018
Published online

Objectives  This study investigated changes in left atrial (LA) volumes and phasic atrial function, by deciles, with normal aging.

Background  LA volume increase is a sensitive independent marker for cardiovascular disease and adverse outcomes. To use this variable more effectively as a marker of pathology and a gauge of outcome, physiological changes due to aging alone need to be quantitated.

Methods  A detailed transthoracic echocardiogram was performed in 220 normal subjects; 89 (41%) were male and their age ranged from 20 to 80 years (mean 45 ± 17 years). Maximum (end-ventricular systole), minimum (end-ventricular diastole), and pre–a-wave volumes were measured using the biplane method of disks. LA filling, passive emptying, conduit and active emptying volumes, and fractions were calculated. Transmitral inflow, pulmonary vein flow, and pulsed-wave Doppler tissue imaging parameters were measured as expressions of left ventricular diastolic function. For purposes of analysis, subjects were divided by age deciles.

Results  LA indexed maximum (0.05 ml/m2 per year) and minimum (0.06 ml/m2 per year) volume increased with age but only became significant in the eighth decade (26.0 ± 6.3 ml/m2, p = 0.02, and 13.5 ± 3.9 ml/m2, respectively; p < 0.001). Impaired left ventricular diastolic relaxation was apparent in decade 6 and was associated with a shift in phasic LA volumes so that LA expansion index and passive emptying decreased with increasing age, whereas active emptying volume increased.

Conclusions  In normal healthy subjects, LA indexed volumes remain nearly stable until the eighth decade when they increase significantly. Therefore, an increase in LA size that occurs before the eighth decade is likely to represent a pathological change. Changes in phasic atrial volumes develop earlier consequent to age-related alteration in LV diastolic relaxation.

Figures in this Article
CI

confidence interval

LA

left atrial

LV

left ventricular

Enlargement of the left atrium has been used as a marker for left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (1) and is an independent predictor of major cardiovascular outcomes (23). An increase in left atrial (LA) size incrementally increases the risk of the development of atrial fibrillation (45), the incidence of which increases with age (68).

It has been assumed that normal aging exerts changes that increase atrial size and impair atrial function, thereby resulting in the observed proportional age-related increase in atrial fibrillation. There are conflicting reports in the literature in relation to age-related changes in LA size; some demonstrate no change (9) and others an increase (1012). A detailed analysis of the changes in LA size and phasic function with each decade of increasing age has not previously been reported in a large healthy cohort. Knowledge of the contribution of aging to atrial enlargement is essential for segregating pathological from physiological alterations.

Thus, the aims of this study were to determine changes in LA volumes and phasic atrial function with normal aging. We hypothesized that with normal aging: 1) LA volume is unchanged until advanced age; 2) passive atrial emptying is progressively decreased in parallel with impaired left ventricular (LV) relaxation; 3) active atrial emptying is progressively increased in parallel with impaired LV relaxation; and 4) the LA expansion index is decreased due to decreased LA compliance with normal aging.

Study approval was obtained from the Committees for Human Research at Westmead and Liverpool Hospitals in Sydney, Australia, for recruitment and collection of data from healthy individuals. All subjects provided written informed consent before enrollment. Two hundred and twenty healthy volunteers were enrolled from the community through an advertising campaign involving presentations and posters. Subjects were screened by a detailed medical history and had to be free of any known cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors. Eighty-nine subjects (41%) were male, and ages ranged from 20 to 80 years with a mean of 45 ± 17 years. In addition to transthoracic echocardiography, all subjects underwent a detailed clinical evaluation including cardiovascular symptoms and history, medication history, family history, height, weight, blood pressure monitoring, electrocardiography, and normal blood tests to exclude any underlying pathology. Furthermore, all subjects were required to have normal findings on echocardiographic examinations, particular with reference to LV hypertrophy, regional and global LV function, and valvular abnormalities. Subjects were excluded if there was any indication of ischemic heart disease, significant valvular disease, peripheral vascular or cerebrovascular disease, hypertension or diabetes, or were on any cardioactive medications. Thus, despite the inherent limitations in selecting truly “normal” subjects, we have made every attempt in the current cohort to accurately represent a normal, healthy aging population.

Subject groups

The normal subjects (n = 220) were divided into groups based on decades of life; decade 3 (n = 51), decade 4 (n = 48), decade 5 (n = 30), decade 6 (n = 41), decade 7 (n = 31), and decade 8 (n = 19). Chronological aging was determined as years since birth. Advanced age was defined as ≥70 years and older in the current cohort.

Echocardiography

Standard transthoracic echocardiography was performed according to established laboratory practice using commercially available ultrasound systems (Vivid 5 and 7 systems, General Electric, Horten, Norway). Measurements were performed offline using Echopac PC 6.1.0. (GE-Vingmed, Horten, Norway) (9).

LV and LA measurements

LV volumes were measured using the modified Simpson's biplane method of disks, and LV systolic function was determined by calculation of LV ejection fraction (13). LV mass index was also determined using the area-length method (14).

LA maximum volume (just before mitral valve opening), LA minimal volume (at mitral valve closure), and LA pre–a-wave volume (onset of P-wave on electrocardiography) were measured using the biplane method of disks (14). Phasic LA volumes and fractions were calculated as follows (9):

  • LA total emptying volume = LA maximum volume − LA minimum volume
  • LA total emptying fraction = LA total emptying volume/LA maximum volume
  • Expansion index = LA filling volume/LA minimum volume
  • Passive emptying volume = LA maximum volume − LA pre–a-wave volume
  • Passive emptying fraction = Passive emptying volume/LA maximum volume
  • Conduit volume = LV stroke volume − (LA total emptying volume)
  • Active emptying volume = LA pre–a-wave volume − LA minimum volume
  • Active emptying fraction = Active emptying volume/LA pre–a-wave volume

All volumes were indexed to body surface area and allometric height (height2.7) (15).

Doppler parameters

Transmitral inflow velocity by pulsed-wave Doppler imaging was obtained with the sample volume placed at the tips of the mitral leaflets. Peak velocity in early diastole (E-wave during early LV relaxation) and late diastole (A-wave during atrial contraction) were measured and the E/A ratio calculated. The velocity time integral of the A-wave was measured and the atrial emptying fraction estimated as the A-wave velocity time integral divided by the total mitral inflow velocity time integral. Additionally, the deceleration time and A-wave duration were measured (9).

Atrial ejection force was calculated from the following equation: atrial ejection force = 0.5 × ρ (density of blood = 1.06 g/cm3) × mitral orifice area × (peak A velocity)2, as previously described (16).

Pulmonary vein velocities were obtained by pulsed-wave Doppler examination from the apical 4-chamber view by placing the sample within the proximal 2 cm of the right upper pulmonary vein. Peak systolic, diastolic, and atrial reversal velocities were measured and the peak systolic–to–peak diastolic velocity ratio obtained. The systolic fraction was calculated as the systolic velocity time integral divided by the total forward pulmonary vein flow velocity time integral. The difference between the atrial reversal duration and the mitral A-wave duration were calculated.

Pulsed-wave Doppler tissue imaging was used to measure peak velocity in systole (S′), early diastole (E′), and late diastole (A′), with the sample volume placed at the septal and lateral annulus (17). The average of the 2 segments were calculated. The E/E′ ratio was calculated as a measure of LV end-diastolic pressure.

LV diastolic dysfunction was classified according to previously defined standard criteria (1819) as normal (deceleration time = 160 to 240 ms, E/A ratio = 0.9 to 1.5, E′ velocity ≥10 cm/s), mild (deceleration time >240 ms, E/A ratio <0.9, E′ velocity <10 cm/s), moderate (deceleration time = 160 to 240 ms, E/A ratio = 0.9 to 1.5, E′ velocity <8 cm/s), and severe (deceleration time <160 ms, E/A ratio >2.0, E′ velocity <5 cm/s). If diastolic function was undetermined using these criteria, E/E′ ratio and pulmonary vein flow were additionally used for classification (18).

Variability

Ten studies were randomly selected for interobserver and intraobserver variability. LA volumes were remeasured by the same observer and by a second independent observer from the digital data using an offline system. Interstudy variability was performed on 10 subjects by repeating their imaging approximately 1 h after initial images were obtained.

Analysis

All values are expressed as a mean ± SD. Differences among the decades were examined by 1-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Stepwise linear regression analysis using body surface area, body mass index, and allometric height were performed to determine independent predictors of LA volumes. Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the correlation of age with LA volume and function parameters, after adjusting for effects of sex. Nonparametric chi-square analysis was used to examine differences in categorical variables (sex and diastolic function grade) among the decades. The differences between grades of diastolic function with demographic and echocardiographic parameters were examined by unpaired Student t test analysis. Bland-Altman (20) analysis was performed to measure interobserver and intraobserver and interstudy variability. Data were considered significant if p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

The mean values for demographic and echocardiographic LV variables by decades are listed in (Table 1). There were no significant differences in sex (p = 0.50), body surface area (p = 0.11), allometric height (p = 0.08), and heart rate (p = 0.74) among the decades. All patients were normotensive, although mean arterial blood pressures were significantly higher in subjects over decade 5. LV echocardiographic parameters were similar for all decades (Table 1).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 1Mean Values for Demographic and LV Indexed Parameters Among Decades of Life
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 3.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 4.
LA volumes

The mean values for LA indexed volumes by decades are listed in (Table 2). LA maximum and minimum volumes increased significantly only in decade 8 (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively), whereas pre–a-wave volume increased in decade 7 (p < 0.001). LA expansion index decreased in decade 8 (p < 0.001), whereas in the seventh decade, passive emptying decreased (p < 0.001) with a reciprocal increase in active emptying (p < 0.001) (Figures 1, 2).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 2Mean Values for LA Volumes and Phasic Volumes Indexed to Body Surface Area Among Decades of Life
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 3.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 4.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 5.
Table Footer Note§p < 0.05 compared with decade 6.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 7.
Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Changes With Decade for LA Maximum Volume Indexed and LA Expansion Index

LA maximum volume (blue line) significantly increased whilst LA expansion index (green line) decreased only in decade 8. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. *p < 0.05 compared with decade 3. †p < 0.05 compared with decade 4. ‡p < 0.05 compared with decade 5. §p < 0.05 compared with decade 6. LA = left atrial.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Changes With Decade for Passive Emptying Volume Indexed and Active Emptying Volume Indexed

Passive emptying volume (blue line) decreased whilst active emptying volume (green line) increased significantly in decade 7. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. *p < 0.05 compared with decade 3. †p < 0.05 compared with decade 4. ‡p < 0.05 compared with decade 5.

Linear regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of LA volume using body size measurements (body surface area, body mass index, and allometric height). Body surface area was the only measurement that independently predicted LA maximum (R2 = 0.13, p < 0.001), minimum (R2 = 0.11, p < 0.001) and pre–a-wave volumes (R2 = 0.10, p < 0.001). Subsequent indexing of volumes to body surface area was used as the standard for all analysis.

There were no significant effects of sex on indexed LA maximum (p = 0.52), minimum (p = 0.41), pre–a-wave (p = 0.44), total emptying (p = 0.84), and conduit (p = 0.13), passive (p = 0.93), and active emptying (p = 0.81) volumes.

There were significant positive linear correlations (Table 3) between age and indexed LA maximum (B coefficient 0.05 ml/m2, SE = 0.02), minimum (B coefficient 0.06 ml/m2, SE = 0.01), and active emptying (B coefficient 0.05 ml/m2, SE = 0.01) volumes. LA maximum volume did not correlate with LV mass (R2 = 0.01, p = 0.18); however, none of the enrolled subjects had LV hypertrophy. Significant negative linear correlations were present between age and LA total emptying fraction (B coefficient = −0.004 ml/m2, SE = 0.01) and expansion index (B coefficient = −0.69 %, SE = 0.19). Age also correlated inversely with passive emptying volume (B coefficient = −0.05 ml/m2, SE = 0.11).

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 3Linear Regression, After Adjusting for Sex, Between Age and LA Volume and Function Parameters
Table Footer Notep < 0.05.
Diastolic function

The mean values for transmitral inflow and pulmonary vein flow parameters by decade are listed in (Table 4). E/A ratio and E′ velocity decreased, whereas atrial fraction and systolic fraction increased as early as decade 4. Changes in peak E velocity were observed in decade 6.

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 4Mean Values for Mitral Inflow, Pulmonary Vein Flow, Tissue Doppler Imaging, and Diastolic Function Among Decades of Life
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 3.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 4.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 5.
Table Footer Note§p < 0.05 compared with decade 6.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 7.

LV diastolic function across the decades is listed in (Table 4). The incidence of mild diastolic dysfunction was significant from decade 6; 86% of the subjects had normal diastolic function, and the remaining 14% had only mild diastolic dysfunction. There was no association between diastolic function and sex (p = 0.85). Subjects with mild diastolic dysfunction were significantly older (p < 0.001; 67 ± 9 years vs. 42 ± 15 years), with a higher mean arterial blood pressure (p = 0.03, 91 ± 8 mm Hg vs. 88 ± 8 mm Hg) and heart rate (p = 0.005; 74 ± 11 beats/min vs. 68 ± 11 beats/min). LA maximum (p = 0.29) and minimum (p = 0.07) volumes did not differ between the subjects with mild diastolic dysfunction and normal diastolic function. Mild diastolic dysfunction was associated with increased active emptying volume (p < 0.001) and fraction (p = 0.005) and atrial ejection force (p < 0.001). Conversely passive emptying volume (p < 0.001) and fraction (p < 0.001) were reduced with mild diastolic dysfunction.

Variability

Bland-Altman analysis for LA maximum volume demonstrated an intraobserver mean difference of −0.3 ml/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.8 to 2.4 ml/m2), an interobserver mean difference of −0.2 ml/m2 (95% CI: −2.8 to 2.4 ml/m2), and an interstudy mean difference of −0.9 ml/m2 (95% CI: −3.8 to 2.0 ml/m2), demonstrating excellent reproducibility. Bland-Altman analysis for LA minimum volume demonstrated an intraobserver mean difference of −0.3 ml/m2 (95% CI: −2.0 to 1.6 ml/m2), an interobserver mean difference of −0.2 ml/m2 (95% CI: −2.0 to 1.6 ml/m2), and an interstudy mean difference of −1.8 ml/m2 (95% CI: −4.3 to 0.7 ml/m2). Bland-Altman analysis for LA pre–a-wave volume demonstrated an intraobserver mean difference of 0.1 ml/m2 (95% CI: −1.5 to 1.6 ml/m2), an interobserver mean difference of 0.1 ml/m2 (95% CI: −1.5 to 1.6 ml/m2), and an interstudy mean difference of 0.6 ml/m2 (95% CI: −1.4 to 2.6 ml/m2).

LA size is increasingly used as a marker for cardiovascular disease (1,45); therefore, enlargement and changes in atrial function due to aging need to be carefully quantitated to differentiate physiological from pathological changes. No study has previously examined LA changes and age-related LV diastolic dysfunction, categorized by decades of life in a large group of healthy individuals.

The salient finding of this study is that significant increases in LA volume occur only in the eighth decade with healthy aging. This observation confirms similar findings observed in a smaller group (12) and also in a large cross-sectional sample (n = 1,012) of middle-aged to elderly healthy subjects recruited from the community (21). The unique feature of our study is that it included adults of all ages and examined the temporal relationship between diastolic changes and changes in LA volumes. Therefore, an increase in LA size in all but the oldest normal subjects (free of atrial arrhythmias, diastolic dysfunction, and valvular disease) should be considered an indicator of underlying cardiovascular pathology. LA minimum volume, a correlate of LV filling pressure (22), also demonstrated an increase only at advanced age, similar to maximal LA volume. Indexed LA volumes were not altered by sex, as demonstrated previously (10). In this healthy cohort, no significant differences were observed between LA volumes indexed to either body surface area or to allometric height, as has also been recently described in an elderly population (2324), whereas only body surface area was an independent predictor of LA size.

We observed that diastolic changes occurred in the sixth decade resulting in mild grade diastolic dysfunction. Klein et al. (25) also demonstrated significantly altered LV filling dynamics in subjects older than 50 years of age. Normal aging results in myocardial fibrosis, altered collagen properties, and abnormal calcium handling within the myocytes of the left ventricle (2627). These ultrastructural changes likely result in reduced LV compliance and relaxation (28). This suggests that changes within the myocytes may occur earlier than chronologically advanced age. Therefore, physiological changes may occur before and are likely present for a significant period before manifestation as chronologically advanced age.

Interestingly, normal aging only results in a mild degree of diastolic impairment and the occurrence of worsening grades of dysfunction (e.g., pseudonormal or restrictive filling) may be due to coexistent pathology. Furthermore, this age-related mild diastolic dysfunction was not associated with immediate LA enlargement (2930), which developed almost 2 decades later. This observation would support the concept that LA volume is a marker of the chronicity of LV diastolic changes, whereas transmitral Doppler imaging–derived LV diastolic measurements are more markers of the LA-to-LV pressure gradient at a time point (1,3134).

Altered LV relaxation with reduced LV suction results in reduced passive atrial emptying, as previously described (911). Consequently, LA active emptying is augmented to compensate for the decreased volume transfer during early diastole (3536). The reciprocal increase in active atrial emptying leads to augmentation of early LA relaxation (3738), which is additionally reflected in the increased pulmonary venous systolic fraction with aging (3940). Thus, it would appear reasonable to surmise that changes in LA phasic function occur largely as an adaptation to LV diastolic changes.

These LA compensatory mechanisms are effective for the sixth and seventh decades, but subsequently a plateau in active emptying fraction is observed in the eighth decade. This is accompanied by a decline in LA compliance, observed as a reduction in the LA expansion index in the eighth decade. The causes for reduced atrial compliance could be multifactorial. An increase in interstitial atrial fibrosis as part of the normal aging process (4143), similar to that observed in the LV, may contribute to LA noncompliance. Additionally, the observed LA changes may in part be consequent to age-related LV diastolic dysfunction.

Altered LA compliance prevents further compensatory augmentation of active atrial emptying. Subsequently, atrial enlargement occurs when the LA stroke volume has to increase beyond that of the Frank-Starling relationship. Therefore, atrial enlargement likely occurs as a consequence of long-term adaptation to LV diastolic dysfunction and reduced atrial compliance, as a consequence of interstitial fibrosis at advanced age in healthy individuals.

Study limitations

The present study was performed with relatively small numbers of subjects, and the subset analysis by decades may lead to beta errors. However, similar changes in LA size at the extremes of age have previously been reported (12,21).

It was beyond the scope of the current study to perform exercise stress tests to confirm normal cardiovascular reserve and exclude underlying ischemia in 220 subjects. However, we made every attempt in line with what would be considered acceptable clinical practice to ensure that the current cohort accurately represents a normal, healthy aging population.

Correlation with histopathology would have permitted a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, but it was considered impractical to obtain biopsy specimens from healthy normal individuals.

The biological age score has been suggested to be superior to chronological age in assessing cardiovascular variables in healthy aging (44). However, derivation of a similar biological score was beyond the scope of our study.

Normal healthy aging does not significantly alter indexed LA maximum or minimum volumes until the eighth decade of life. However, changes in phasic LA function occurred as early as decade 6 as a compensatory response to age-related LV diastolic dysfunction. At advanced age, long-term adaptation to LV diastolic dysfunction together with reduced LA compliance results in atrial enlargement.

The authors acknowledge Karen Byth, PhD, DIC, C. Stat. RSS, for assistance with statistical analysis.

Kizer  J.R., Bella  J.N., Palmieri  V.; Left atrial diameter as an independent predictor of first clinical cardiovascular events in middle-aged and elderly adults: the Strong Heart Study (SHS). Am Heart J. 151 2006:412-418.
Tsang  T.S., Barnes  M.E., Gersh  B.J.; Prediction of risk for first age-related cardiovascular events in an elderly population: the incremental value of echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 42 2003:1199-1205.
Chinali  M., de Simone  G., Roman  M.J.; Left atrial systolic force and cardiovascular outcome. The Strong Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 18 2005:1570-1576. ; discussion 1577
Vaziri  S.M., Larson  M.G., Benjamin  E.J., Levy  D.; Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 89 1994:724-730.
Tsang  T.S., Abhayaratna  W.P., Barnes  M.E.; Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 47 2006:1018-1023.
Kannel  W.B., Abbott  R.D., Savage  D.D., McNamara  P.M.; Epidemiological features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 306 1982:1018-1022.
Benjamin  E.J., D'Agostino  R.B., Belanger  A.J., Wolf  P.A., Levy  D.; Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 92 1995:835-841.
Prystowsky  E.N., Benson  D.W.  Jr., Fuster  V.; Management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A statement for healthcare professionals. From the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 93 1996:1262-1277.
Thomas  L., Levett  K., Boyd  A., Leung  D.Y., Schiller  N.B., Ross  D.L.; Compensatory changes in atrial volumes with normal aging: is atrial enlargement inevitable?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 40 2002:1630-1635.
Nikitin  N.P., Witte  K.K., Thackray  S.D., Goodge  L.J., Clark  A.L., Cleland  J.G.; Effect of age and sex on left atrial morphology and function. Eur J Echocardiogr. 4 2003:36-42.
Triposkiadis  F., Tentolouris  K., Androulakis  A.; Left atrial mechanical function in the healthy elderly: new insights from a combined assessment of changes in atrial volume and transmitral flow velocity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 8 1995:801-809.
Gardin  J.M., Henry  W.L., Savage  D.D., Ware  J.H., Burn  C., Borer  J.S.; Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects: evaluation of an adult population without clinically apparent heart disease. J Clin Ultrasound. 7 1979:439-447.
Schiller  N.B., Shah  P.M., Crawford  M.; Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2 1989:358-367.
Lang  R.M., Bierig  M., Devereux  R.B.; Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 18 2005:1440-1463.
Dewey  F.E., Rosenthal  D., Murphy  D.J.  Jr., Froelicher  V.F., Ashley  E.A.; Does size matter?. Clinical applications of scaling cardiac size and function for body size. Circulation. 117 2008:2279-2287.
Manning  W.J., Silverman  D.I., Katz  S.E., Douglas  P.S.; Atrial ejection force: a noninvasive assessment of atrial systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 22 1993:221-225.
Thomas  L., Levett  K., Boyd  A., Leung  D.Y., Schiller  N.B., Ross  D.L.; Changes in regional left atrial function with aging: evaluation by Doppler tissue imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr. 4 2003:92-100.
Lester  S.J., Tajik  A.J., Nishimura  R.A., Oh  J.K., Khandheria  B.K., Seward  J.B.; Unlocking the mysteries of diastolic function: deciphering the Rosetta Stone 10 years later. J Am Coll Cardiol. 51 2008:679-689.
Nagueh  S.F., Appleton  C.P., Gillebert  T.C.; Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 22 2009:107-133.
Bland  J.M., Altman  D.G.; Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1 1986:307-310.
Munagala  V.K., Jacobsen  S.J., Mahoney  D.W., Rodeheffer  R.J., Bailey  K.R., Redfield  M.M.; Association of newer diastolic function parameters with age in healthy subjects: a population-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 16 2003:1049-1056.
Fatema  K., Barnes  M.E., Bailey  K.R.; Minimum vs. maximum left atrial volume for prediction of first atrial fibrillation or flutter in an elderly cohort: a prospective study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 10 2009:282-286.
Aurigemma  G.P., Gottdiener  J.S., Arnold  A.M., Chinali  M., Hill  J.C., Kitzman  D.; Left atrial volume and geometry in healthy aging: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2 2009:282-289.
Ristow  B., Ali  S., Na  B., Turakhia  M.P., Whooley  M.A., Schiller  N.B.; Predicting heart failure hospitalization and mortality by quantitative echocardiography: is body surface area the indexing method of choice?. The Heart and Soul Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 23 2010:406-413.
Klein  A.L., Burstow  D.J., Tajik  A.J., Zachariah  P.K., Bailey  K.R., Seward  J.B.; Effects of age on left ventricular dimensions and filling dynamics in 117 normal persons. Mayo Clin Proc. 69 1994:212-224.
Tokushima  T., Reid  C.L., Gardin  J.M.; Left ventricular diastolic function in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 10 2001:20-29.
Lakatta  E.G.; Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: Part III: cellular and molecular clues to heart and arterial aging. Circulation. 107 2003:490-497.
Gilbert  J.C., Glantz  S.A.; Determinants of left ventricular filling and of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. Circ Res. 64 1989:827-852.
Tsang  T.S., Barnes  M.E., Gersh  B.J., Bailey  K.R., Seward  J.B.; Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol. 90 2002:1284-1289.
Pritchett  A.M., Mahoney  D.W., Jacobsen  S.J., Rodeheffer  R.J., Karon  B.L., Redfield  M.M.; Diastolic dysfunction and left atrial volume: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 45 2005:87-92.
Moller  J.E., Hillis  G.S., Oh  J.K.; Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 107 2003:2207-2212.
Wierzbowska-Drabik  K., Krzeminska-Pakula  M., Drozdz  J.; Enlarged left atrium is a simple and strong predictor of poor prognosis in patients after myocardial infarction. Echocardiography. 25 2008:27-35.
Baysan  O., Yokusoglu  M., Uzun  M.; Left atrial functions after myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels. 20 2005:56-60.
Beinart  R., Boyko  V., Schwammenthal  E.; Long-term prognostic significance of left atrial volume in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 44 2004:327-334.
Gerstenblith  G., Frederiksen  J., Yin  F.C., Fortuin  N.J., Lakatta  E.G., Weisfeldt  M.L.; Echocardiographic assessment of a normal adult aging population. Circulation. 56 1977:273-278.
Gutman  J., Wang  Y.S., Wahr  D., Schiller  N.B.; Normal left atrial function determined by 2-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 51 1983:336-340.
Barbier  P., Solomon  S.B., Schiller  N.B., Glantz  S.A.; Left atrial relaxation and left ventricular systolic function determine left atrial reservoir function. Circulation. 100 1999:427-436.
Prioli  A., Marino  P., Lanzoni  L., Zardini  P.; Increasing degrees of left ventricular filling impairment modulate left atrial function in humans. Am J Cardiol. 82 1998:756-761.
Kuecherer  H.F., Muhiudeen  I.A., Kusumoto  F.M.; Estimation of mean left atrial pressure from transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography of pulmonary venous flow. Circulation. 82 1990:1127-1139.
Arakawa  M., Akamatsu  S., Terazawa  E.; Age-related increase in systolic fraction of pulmonary vein flow velocity-time integral from transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in subjects without cardiac disease. Am J Cardiol. 70 1992:1190-1194.
Spach  M.S., Dolber  P.C.; Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic propagation at a microscopic level in human cardiac muscle. Evidence for electrical uncoupling of side-to-side fiber connections with increasing age. Circ Res. 58 1986:356-371.
Hayashi  H., Wang  C., Miyauchi  Y.; Aging-related increase to inducible atrial fibrillation in the rat model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 13 2002:801-808.
Anyukhovsky  E.P., Sosunov  E.A., Plotnikov  A.; Cellular electrophysiologic properties of old canine atria provide a substrate for arrhythmogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 54 2002:462-469.
Bai  X., Han  L., Liu  Q.; Evaluation of biological aging process—a population-based study of healthy people in China. Gerontology. 56 2010:129-140.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Changes With Decade for LA Maximum Volume Indexed and LA Expansion Index

LA maximum volume (blue line) significantly increased whilst LA expansion index (green line) decreased only in decade 8. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. *p < 0.05 compared with decade 3. †p < 0.05 compared with decade 4. ‡p < 0.05 compared with decade 5. §p < 0.05 compared with decade 6. LA = left atrial.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Changes With Decade for Passive Emptying Volume Indexed and Active Emptying Volume Indexed

Passive emptying volume (blue line) decreased whilst active emptying volume (green line) increased significantly in decade 7. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. *p < 0.05 compared with decade 3. †p < 0.05 compared with decade 4. ‡p < 0.05 compared with decade 5.

Tables

Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 1Mean Values for Demographic and LV Indexed Parameters Among Decades of Life
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 3.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 4.
Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 2Mean Values for LA Volumes and Phasic Volumes Indexed to Body Surface Area Among Decades of Life
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 3.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 4.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 5.
Table Footer Note§p < 0.05 compared with decade 6.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 7.
Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 3Linear Regression, After Adjusting for Sex, Between Age and LA Volume and Function Parameters
Table Footer Notep < 0.05.
Table Grahic Jump Location
Table 4Mean Values for Mitral Inflow, Pulmonary Vein Flow, Tissue Doppler Imaging, and Diastolic Function Among Decades of Life
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 3.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 4.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 5.
Table Footer Note§p < 0.05 compared with decade 6.
Table Footer Notep < 0.05 compared with decade 7.

Interactive Graphics

Video

References

Kizer  J.R., Bella  J.N., Palmieri  V.; Left atrial diameter as an independent predictor of first clinical cardiovascular events in middle-aged and elderly adults: the Strong Heart Study (SHS). Am Heart J. 151 2006:412-418.
Tsang  T.S., Barnes  M.E., Gersh  B.J.; Prediction of risk for first age-related cardiovascular events in an elderly population: the incremental value of echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 42 2003:1199-1205.
Chinali  M., de Simone  G., Roman  M.J.; Left atrial systolic force and cardiovascular outcome. The Strong Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 18 2005:1570-1576. ; discussion 1577
Vaziri  S.M., Larson  M.G., Benjamin  E.J., Levy  D.; Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 89 1994:724-730.
Tsang  T.S., Abhayaratna  W.P., Barnes  M.E.; Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 47 2006:1018-1023.
Kannel  W.B., Abbott  R.D., Savage  D.D., McNamara  P.M.; Epidemiological features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 306 1982:1018-1022.
Benjamin  E.J., D'Agostino  R.B., Belanger  A.J., Wolf  P.A., Levy  D.; Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 92 1995:835-841.
Prystowsky  E.N., Benson  D.W.  Jr., Fuster  V.; Management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A statement for healthcare professionals. From the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 93 1996:1262-1277.
Thomas  L., Levett  K., Boyd  A., Leung  D.Y., Schiller  N.B., Ross  D.L.; Compensatory changes in atrial volumes with normal aging: is atrial enlargement inevitable?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 40 2002:1630-1635.
Nikitin  N.P., Witte  K.K., Thackray  S.D., Goodge  L.J., Clark  A.L., Cleland  J.G.; Effect of age and sex on left atrial morphology and function. Eur J Echocardiogr. 4 2003:36-42.
Triposkiadis  F., Tentolouris  K., Androulakis  A.; Left atrial mechanical function in the healthy elderly: new insights from a combined assessment of changes in atrial volume and transmitral flow velocity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 8 1995:801-809.
Gardin  J.M., Henry  W.L., Savage  D.D., Ware  J.H., Burn  C., Borer  J.S.; Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects: evaluation of an adult population without clinically apparent heart disease. J Clin Ultrasound. 7 1979:439-447.
Schiller  N.B., Shah  P.M., Crawford  M.; Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2 1989:358-367.
Lang  R.M., Bierig  M., Devereux  R.B.; Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 18 2005:1440-1463.
Dewey  F.E., Rosenthal  D., Murphy  D.J.  Jr., Froelicher  V.F., Ashley  E.A.; Does size matter?. Clinical applications of scaling cardiac size and function for body size. Circulation. 117 2008:2279-2287.
Manning  W.J., Silverman  D.I., Katz  S.E., Douglas  P.S.; Atrial ejection force: a noninvasive assessment of atrial systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 22 1993:221-225.
Thomas  L., Levett  K., Boyd  A., Leung  D.Y., Schiller  N.B., Ross  D.L.; Changes in regional left atrial function with aging: evaluation by Doppler tissue imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr. 4 2003:92-100.
Lester  S.J., Tajik  A.J., Nishimura  R.A., Oh  J.K., Khandheria  B.K., Seward  J.B.; Unlocking the mysteries of diastolic function: deciphering the Rosetta Stone 10 years later. J Am Coll Cardiol. 51 2008:679-689.
Nagueh  S.F., Appleton  C.P., Gillebert  T.C.; Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 22 2009:107-133.
Bland  J.M., Altman  D.G.; Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1 1986:307-310.
Munagala  V.K., Jacobsen  S.J., Mahoney  D.W., Rodeheffer  R.J., Bailey  K.R., Redfield  M.M.; Association of newer diastolic function parameters with age in healthy subjects: a population-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 16 2003:1049-1056.
Fatema  K., Barnes  M.E., Bailey  K.R.; Minimum vs. maximum left atrial volume for prediction of first atrial fibrillation or flutter in an elderly cohort: a prospective study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 10 2009:282-286.
Aurigemma  G.P., Gottdiener  J.S., Arnold  A.M., Chinali  M., Hill  J.C., Kitzman  D.; Left atrial volume and geometry in healthy aging: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2 2009:282-289.
Ristow  B., Ali  S., Na  B., Turakhia  M.P., Whooley  M.A., Schiller  N.B.; Predicting heart failure hospitalization and mortality by quantitative echocardiography: is body surface area the indexing method of choice?. The Heart and Soul Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 23 2010:406-413.
Klein  A.L., Burstow  D.J., Tajik  A.J., Zachariah  P.K., Bailey  K.R., Seward  J.B.; Effects of age on left ventricular dimensions and filling dynamics in 117 normal persons. Mayo Clin Proc. 69 1994:212-224.
Tokushima  T., Reid  C.L., Gardin  J.M.; Left ventricular diastolic function in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 10 2001:20-29.
Lakatta  E.G.; Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: Part III: cellular and molecular clues to heart and arterial aging. Circulation. 107 2003:490-497.
Gilbert  J.C., Glantz  S.A.; Determinants of left ventricular filling and of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. Circ Res. 64 1989:827-852.
Tsang  T.S., Barnes  M.E., Gersh  B.J., Bailey  K.R., Seward  J.B.; Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol. 90 2002:1284-1289.
Pritchett  A.M., Mahoney  D.W., Jacobsen  S.J., Rodeheffer  R.J., Karon  B.L., Redfield  M.M.; Diastolic dysfunction and left atrial volume: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 45 2005:87-92.
Moller  J.E., Hillis  G.S., Oh  J.K.; Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 107 2003:2207-2212.
Wierzbowska-Drabik  K., Krzeminska-Pakula  M., Drozdz  J.; Enlarged left atrium is a simple and strong predictor of poor prognosis in patients after myocardial infarction. Echocardiography. 25 2008:27-35.
Baysan  O., Yokusoglu  M., Uzun  M.; Left atrial functions after myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels. 20 2005:56-60.
Beinart  R., Boyko  V., Schwammenthal  E.; Long-term prognostic significance of left atrial volume in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 44 2004:327-334.
Gerstenblith  G., Frederiksen  J., Yin  F.C., Fortuin  N.J., Lakatta  E.G., Weisfeldt  M.L.; Echocardiographic assessment of a normal adult aging population. Circulation. 56 1977:273-278.
Gutman  J., Wang  Y.S., Wahr  D., Schiller  N.B.; Normal left atrial function determined by 2-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 51 1983:336-340.
Barbier  P., Solomon  S.B., Schiller  N.B., Glantz  S.A.; Left atrial relaxation and left ventricular systolic function determine left atrial reservoir function. Circulation. 100 1999:427-436.
Prioli  A., Marino  P., Lanzoni  L., Zardini  P.; Increasing degrees of left ventricular filling impairment modulate left atrial function in humans. Am J Cardiol. 82 1998:756-761.
Kuecherer  H.F., Muhiudeen  I.A., Kusumoto  F.M.; Estimation of mean left atrial pressure from transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography of pulmonary venous flow. Circulation. 82 1990:1127-1139.
Arakawa  M., Akamatsu  S., Terazawa  E.; Age-related increase in systolic fraction of pulmonary vein flow velocity-time integral from transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in subjects without cardiac disease. Am J Cardiol. 70 1992:1190-1194.
Spach  M.S., Dolber  P.C.; Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic propagation at a microscopic level in human cardiac muscle. Evidence for electrical uncoupling of side-to-side fiber connections with increasing age. Circ Res. 58 1986:356-371.
Hayashi  H., Wang  C., Miyauchi  Y.; Aging-related increase to inducible atrial fibrillation in the rat model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 13 2002:801-808.
Anyukhovsky  E.P., Sosunov  E.A., Plotnikov  A.; Cellular electrophysiologic properties of old canine atria provide a substrate for arrhythmogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 54 2002:462-469.
Bai  X., Han  L., Liu  Q.; Evaluation of biological aging process—a population-based study of healthy people in China. Gerontology. 56 2010:129-140.

Correspondence

Latest JACC CME

Continuing Medical Education through JACC is a convenient way to fulfill your CME requirements while learning important information about the latest advances in cardiovascular medicine.

April 2013- JACC CME Activity
Repeat Revascularization and Outcome

March 2013- JACC CME Activity
Extreme Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction

Feb 2013- JACC CME Activity
Results from the BARI 2D Trial

Jan 2013- JACC CME Activity
Prognosis Among Healthy Individuals Discharged With a Primary Diagnosis of Syncope

Dec 2012- JACC CME Activity
Incidence of Heart Failure or Cardiomyopathy After Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy for Breast Cancer

Nov 2012- JACC CME Activity
A Collaborative Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 10 Randomized Trials

Oct 2012- JACC CME Activity
Radiofrequency Ablation of Premature Ventricular Ectopy Improves the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Nonresponders

Sept 2012- JACC CME Activity
Exercise and Pharmacological Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Aug 2012- JACC CME Activity
Reduction in Life-Threatening Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Statin-Treated Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Enrolled in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)

July 2012- JACC CME Activity
Relationship of Beta-Blocker Dose With Outcomes in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients With Systolic Dysfunction

For previous CME quizzes, please follow this link to CardioSource Lifelong Learning and MOC.

 

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles