B.R.; Burden of disease—implications for future research. JAMA. 285 2001:535-539.
C.; 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 28 2007:3042-3050.
P.; Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 48 2006:1896-1910.
M.; Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography—meta-analysis. Radiology. 245 2007:720-731.
G.S.; 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 94 2008:1386-1393.
L.J.; Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J. 151 2006:404-411.
P.; Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 30 2009:362-371.
T.; Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 18 2008:1162-1173.
R.B.; Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 50 2007:1161-1170.
J.W.; Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 49 2007:62-70.
A.; Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 24-month follow-up study. Eur Radiol. 19 2009:1653-1660.
T.; Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2 2009:404-411.
J.D.; Multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification in patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood. Heart. 95 2009:1607-1611.
A.J.; Triage of patients with acute chest pain and possible cardiac ischemia: the elusive search for diagnostic perfection. Ann Intern Med. 139 2003:987-995.
C.U.; Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 53 2009:1642-1650.
J.H.; The disposition decision on emergency department patients with chest pain is affected by the results of multi-detector computed axial tomography scan of the coronary arteries. J Emerg Med. 39 2010:57-64.
A., von Ziegler
F.; Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 46 2005:154
R.L.; A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 51 1975:5-40.
V.; Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 105 2002:539-542.
F.; Incremental diagnostic value of regional left ventricular function over coronary assessment by cardiac computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain: from the ROMICAT Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 3 2010:375-383.
M.; Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2 1989:358-367.
C.; Disagreement between formal and medical record criteria for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med. 12 2005:446-452.
P.J.; The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 284 2000:835-842.
R.A.; Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 247 1982:2543-2546.
T.; Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation. 115 2007:1762-1768.
N.; Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 52 2008:1335-1343.
F.S.; One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med. 16 2009:693-698.
O.; Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 53 2009:623-632.
A., Bacchi Reggiani
M.L.; Incremental prognostic value of coronary ct angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 3 2010:351-359.
Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L, et al. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol;55:1017–28.
A.M.; Incremental prognostic significance of left ventricular dysfunction to coronary artery disease detection by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for the prediction of all-cause mortality: results from a two-centre study of 5330 patients. Eur Heart J. 31 2010:1212-1219.
G.L.; A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 49 2007:863-871.
J.E.; Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. Acad Emerg Med. 13 2006:13-18.
J.E.; Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population. Ann Emerg Med. 48 2006:252-259.
O.; Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 29 2008:191-197.
F.; Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 301 2009:500-507.
T.; Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol. 19 2009:2576-2583.
B.L.; Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 16 2006:1424-1433.
F.; Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191 2008:455-463.