Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 7 Intertechnique Comparisons for CMR Measurements of LV Volumes

Results of linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses of agreement between LV volumes measured in 19 patients using volumetric analysis of interpolated 3D CMR datasets (QLAB Advanced software) and the conventional method of disk approximation (ViewForum software, Philips). The high levels of agreement evidenced by these results ruled out analysis-related differences between RT3DE and CMR measurements as a significant source of error. LOA = limits of agreement; other abbreviations as in Figures 1, 2, and 5.