This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) View CVN Interview View Talk Back Posting Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JACC Imaging Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Detaint, D. Articles by Enriquez-Sarano, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Detaint, D. Articles by Enriquez-Sarano, M.

Quantitative Echocardiographic Determinants of Clinical Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Aortic Regurgitation

A Prospective Study

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. (Email: Sarano.maurice{at}mayo.edu).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to define the link between aortic regurgitation (AR) quantitation and clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with AR.

Background: Quantitative American Society of Echocardiography (QASE) thresholds are recommended for AR assessment, but impact on clinical outcome is unknown.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled (1991 to 2003) 251 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 17 years) with isolated AR and ejection fraction 50% with quantified AR and left ventricular (LV) volumes using Doppler-echocardiography.

Results: Survival under medical management was independently determined by baseline regurgitant volume (RVol) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.35] per 10 ml/beat, p = 0.002) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) (adjusted HR 1.52 [95% CI 1.19 to 1.91] per 10 mm², p = 0.002), which superseded traditional AR grading. Patients with QASE-severe AR (RVol 60 ml/beat or ERO 30 mm²) versus QASE-mild AR (RVol <30 ml and ERO <10 mm²) had lower survival (10 years: 69 ± 9% vs. 92 ± 4%, p = 0.05) independently of all clinical characteristics (adjusted HR 4.1 [95% CI 1.4 to 14.1], p = 0.01) and lower survival free of surgery for AR (10 years: 20 ± 5% vs. 92 ± 4%, p < 0.001, adjusted HR 12.9 [95% CI 5.4 to 38.5]). Cardiac events were considerably more frequent with QASE-severe versus -moderate or -mild AR (10 years: 63 ± 8% vs. 34 ± 6% and 21 ± 8%, p < 0.0001). Independent determinants of cardiac events were quantitative AR grading (QASE-severe adjusted HR 5.2 [95% CI 2.2 to 14.8], p < 0.001; QASE-moderate adjusted HR 2.4 [95% CI 1.06 to 6.6], p = 0.035), which superseded traditional AR assessment (p < 0.001) and LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) (adjusted HR 1.09 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.14 per 10 ml/m²], p = 0.002), which superseded LV M-mode diameters. In QASE-severe AR, patients with ESVI 45 versus <45 ml/m² had higher cardiac event rates (10 years: 87 ± 8% vs. 40 ± 10%, p < 0.001). Cardiac surgery for AR reduced cardiac events in patients with QASE-severe AR (adjusted HR 0.23 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.57], p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Echocardiographic quantitation of AR severity and ESVI provides independent and superior predictors of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with AR and ejection fraction 50% and should be widely clinically applied. Patients with QASE-severe AR and ESVI 45 ml/m² should be carefully considered for cardiac surgery, which reduces cardiac events risk.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   AR = aortic regurgitation   EF = ejection fraction   ERO = effective regurgitant orifice   ESVI = end-systolic volume index   LV = left ventricle/ventricular   QASE = quantitative American Society of Echocardiography   RVol = regurgitant volume

Related articles in JACC Imaging:

Cardiologists: Do We Have the Right to Call Ourselves Physiologists?

Blase A. Carabello
JACC Imaging 2008 1: 12-14. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Heidenreich Is Quantitation a Good Value? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 404 - 404. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Enriquez-Sarano Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 404 - 405. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Cardiologists: Do We Have the Right to Call Ourselves Physiologists? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 12 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF]