Randomized Comparison of 64-Slice Single- and Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
Stephan Achenbach, MD*,*,
Ulrike Ropers, MD*,
Axel Kuettner, MD ,
Katharina Anders, MD ,
Tobias Pflederer, MD*,
Sei Komatsu, MD*,
Werner Bautz, MD ,
Werner G. Daniel, MD*,
Dieter Ropers, MD*
* Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stephan Achenbach, University of Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. (Email: Stephan.achenbach{at}uk-erlangen.de).
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of a systematic approach to lower heart rate for coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice single- and dual-source CT.
Background: Coronary CT angiography is often impaired by motion artifacts, so that routine lowering of heart rate is usually recommended. This is often conceived as a major limitation of the technique. It is expected that higher temporal resolution, such as with dual-source 64-slice CT, would allow diagnostic imaging even without systematic pre-treatment for lowering the heart rate.
Methods: Two hundred patients with suspected coronary artery disease were first randomized to either 64-slice single-source CT (n = 100) or dual-source CT (n = 100) for contrast-enhanced coronary artery evaluation. In each group, patients were further randomized to either receive systematic heart rate control (oral and intravenous beta-blockade for a target heart rate 60 beats/min) or receive no premedication. Evaluability of datasets and diagnostic accuracy were compared between groups against the results obtained from invasive angiography.
Results: Systematic pre-treatment lowered heart rate during CT coronary angiography by 10 beats/min. Heart rate control significantly improved evaluability in single-source CT (93% vs. 69% on a per-patient basis, p = 0.005), whereas it did not in dual-source CT (96% vs. 98%). In evaluable patients, sensitivity to detect the presence of at least 1 coronary stenosis by single-source CT was 86% and 79%, respectively, with and without heart rate control (p = NS). For dual-source CT, it was 100% and 95%, respectively (p = NS). The rate of correctly classified patients, defined as evaluable and correct classification as to the presence or absence of at least 1 coronary artery stenosis, was significantly improved by heart rate control in single-source CT (78% vs. 57%, p = 0.04), whereas there was no such influence in dual-source CT (87% vs. 93%).
Conclusions: Systematic heart rate control significantly improves image quality for coronary visualization by 64-slice single-source CT, whereas image quality and diagnostic accuracy remain unaffected in dual-source CT angiography. Improved temporal resolution obviates the need for heart rate control.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CT = computed tomography | | MDCT = multi-detector computed tomography |
|
Related articles in JACC Imaging:
- Another Step Forward in CT Angiography
- João A.C. Lima
JACC Imaging 2008 1: 187-189.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Achenbach
Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Computed Tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2008;
1(4):
472 - 474.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A.C. Lima
Another Step Forward in CT Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
March 1, 2008;
1(2):
187 - 189.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|