top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:177-186, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.11.006
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JACC Imaging
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ropers, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ropers, D.

Randomized Comparison of 64-Slice Single- and Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

Stephan Achenbach, MD*,*, Ulrike Ropers, MD*, Axel Kuettner, MD{dagger}, Katharina Anders, MD{dagger}, Tobias Pflederer, MD*, Sei Komatsu, MD*, Werner Bautz, MD{dagger}, Werner G. Daniel, MD*, Dieter Ropers, MD*

* Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
{dagger} Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Stephan Achenbach, University of Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. (Email: Stephan.achenbach{at}uk-erlangen.de).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of a systematic approach to lower heart rate for coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice single- and dual-source CT.

Background: Coronary CT angiography is often impaired by motion artifacts, so that routine lowering of heart rate is usually recommended. This is often conceived as a major limitation of the technique. It is expected that higher temporal resolution, such as with dual-source 64-slice CT, would allow diagnostic imaging even without systematic pre-treatment for lowering the heart rate.

Methods: Two hundred patients with suspected coronary artery disease were first randomized to either 64-slice single-source CT (n = 100) or dual-source CT (n = 100) for contrast-enhanced coronary artery evaluation. In each group, patients were further randomized to either receive systematic heart rate control (oral and intravenous beta-blockade for a target heart rate ≤60 beats/min) or receive no premedication. Evaluability of datasets and diagnostic accuracy were compared between groups against the results obtained from invasive angiography.

Results: Systematic pre-treatment lowered heart rate during CT coronary angiography by 10 beats/min. Heart rate control significantly improved evaluability in single-source CT (93% vs. 69% on a per-patient basis, p = 0.005), whereas it did not in dual-source CT (96% vs. 98%). In evaluable patients, sensitivity to detect the presence of at least 1 coronary stenosis by single-source CT was 86% and 79%, respectively, with and without heart rate control (p = NS). For dual-source CT, it was 100% and 95%, respectively (p = NS). The rate of correctly classified patients, defined as evaluable and correct classification as to the presence or absence of at least 1 coronary artery stenosis, was significantly improved by heart rate control in single-source CT (78% vs. 57%, p = 0.04), whereas there was no such influence in dual-source CT (87% vs. 93%).

Conclusions: Systematic heart rate control significantly improves image quality for coronary visualization by 64-slice single-source CT, whereas image quality and diagnostic accuracy remain unaffected in dual-source CT angiography. Improved temporal resolution obviates the need for heart rate control.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CT = computed tomography
  MDCT = multi-detector computed tomography


Related articles in JACC Imaging:

Another Step Forward in CT Angiography
João A.C. Lima
JACC Imaging 2008 1: 187-189. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
S. Achenbach
Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Computed Tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 472 - 474.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
J. A.C. Lima
Another Step Forward in CT Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 187 - 189.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link