This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schuijf, J. D. Articles by Bax, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schuijf, J. D. Articles by Bax, J. J.

Invasive Versus Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease

Joanne D. Schuijf, PhD^_*, Jacob M. van Werkhoven, MSc^_*,, Gabija Pundziute, MD^_*, J. Wouter Jukema, MD, PhD^_*,, Isabel Decramer, MSc^||, Marcel P. Stokkel, PhD, MD, Petra Dibbets-Schneider, MSc, Martin J. Schalij, MD, PhD^_*, Johannes H.C. Reiber, PhD, Ernst E. van der Wall, MD, PhD, William Wijns, MD, PhD^||, Jeroen J. Bax, MD, PhD^_*,_*

^_* Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
The Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
^|| The Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jeroen J. Bax, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. (Email: j.j.bax{at}lumc.nl).

Objectives: We sought to compare the diagnostic information obtained from noninvasive characterization of coronary artery disease by using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and to compare findings with the use of invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Background: Preliminary comparisons have suggested that abnormal myocardial perfusion studies correlate well with significant luminal stenosis on MDCT coronary angiography. However, atherosclerotic coronary lesions may be detectable with the use of MDCT even in the presence of normal myocardial perfusion

Methods: We performed MDCT, MPI, and conventional coronary angiography in 70 patients. In addition, IVUS was performed in 53 patients. Quantitative information was obtained from quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS assessment of plaque burden and minimal luminal area.

Results: Of 26 patients with an abnormal MPI study, 23 (88%) showed significant stenosis on MDCT. As compared with QCA, MDCT showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 67% for the detection of stenoses 50% diameter narrowing in these patients. Mean diameter stenosis on QCA was 76% and mean minimal lumen area in IVUS was 3.3 mm². On the other hand, 27 (84%) of 44 patients with normal MPI had evidence of coronary atherosclerosis on MDCT (luminal stenosis 50%: n = 15, luminal stenosis <50%: n = 12, sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 83% as compared with QCA). Using IVUS, we found substantial plaque burden (mean 58.9 ± 18.1% of cross-sectional area), but presence of a stenosis (minimal lumen area <4.0 mm²) in only 14 patients (mean minimal lumen area, 5.8 ± 3.3 mm²). Only 7 patients with normal myocardial perfusion scans demonstrated absence of coronary atherosclerosis by MDCT.

Conclusions: Considerable plaque burden can be observed with MDCT even in the absence of myocardial perfusion abnormalities. This finding does not constitute a false-positive MDCT result, but rather reflects the fact that MDCT can detect atherosclerotic lesions that are not flow-limiting.

Abbreviations and Acronyms   CAD = coronary artery disease   EEM = external elastic membrane   IVUS = intravascular ultrasound   MDCT = multidetector computed tomography   MLA = minimal lumen area   MPI = myocardial perfusion imaging   QCA = quantitative coronary angiography   RI = remodeling index   SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography