Noninvasive Evaluation of the Aortic Root With Multislice Computed TomographyImplications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Laurens F. Tops, MD*,*,
David A. Wood, MD ,
Victoria Delgado, MD*,
Joanne D. Schuijf, MSc*,
John R. Mayo, MD ,
Sanjeevan Pasupati, MD ,
Frouke P.L. Lamers, MD*,
Ernst E. van der Wall, MD, PhD*,
Martin J. Schalij, MD, PhD*,
John G. Webb, MD ,
Jeroen J. Bax, MD, PhD, FACC*
* Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Division of Cardiology, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Laurens F. Tops, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. (Email: l.f.tops{at}lumc.nl).
Objectives: In the present study, the anatomy of the aortic root was assessed noninvasively with multislice computed tomography (MSCT).
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been proposed as an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. For this procedure, detailed knowledge of aortic annulus diameters and the relation between the annulus and the coronary arteries is needed.
Methods: In 169 patients (111 men, age 54 ± 11 years), a 64-slice MSCT scan was performed for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Of these, 150 patients had no or mild aortic stenosis, and 19 patients had moderate to severe aortic stenosis. Reconstructed coronal and sagittal views were used for assessment of the aortic annulus diameter in 2 directions. In addition, the distance between the annulus and the ostium of the right and left coronary arteries and the length of the coronary leaflets were assessed. The LV outflow tract and interventricular septum were analyzed on the single oblique sagittal view at end-diastole.
Results: The diameter of the aortic annulus was 26.3 ± 2.8 mm on the coronal view, and 23.5 ± 2.7 mm on the sagittal view. Mean difference between the 2 diameters was 2.9 ± 1.8 mm, indicating an oval shape of the aortic annulus. Mean distance between the aortic annulus and the ostium of the right coronary artery was 17.2 ± 3.3 mm, and mean distance between the annulus and the ostium of the left coronary artery was 14.4 ± 2.9 mm. In 82 patients (49%), the length of the left coronary leaflet exceeded the distance between the annulus and the ostium of the left coronary artery. There were no significant differences in the diameter of annulus, diameter of sinus of Valsalva, or the distance between the annulus, left coronary leaflet, and the ostium of the left coronary artery, between the patient with and without severe aortic stenosis.
Conclusions: The MSCT can provide detailed information on the shape of the aortic annulus and the relation between the annulus and the ostia of the coronary arteries. Thereby, MSCT may be helpful for avoiding paravalvular leakage and coronary occlusion and may facilitate the selection of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | AS = aortic stenosis | | CT = computed tomography | | MSCT = multislice computed tomography |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Messika-Zeitoun, J.-M. Serfaty, E. Brochet, G. Ducrocq, L. Lepage, D. Detaint, F. Hyafil, D. Himbert, N. Pasi, J.-P. Laissy, et al.
Multimodal Assessment of the Aortic Annulus Diameter: Implications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 19, 2010;
55(3):
186 - 194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Tuzcu, S. R. Kapadia, and P. Schoenhagen
Multimodality Quantitative Imaging of Aortic Root for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: More Complex Than It Appears
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
January 19, 2010;
55(3):
195 - 197.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Kurra, S. R. Kapadia, E. M. Tuzcu, S. S. Halliburton, L. Svensson, E. E. Roselli, and P. Schoenhagen
Pre-Procedural Imaging of Aortic Root Orientation and Dimensions: Comparison Between X-Ray Angiographic Planar Imaging and 3-Dimensional Multidetector Row Computed Tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
January 1, 2010;
3(1):
105 - 113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. C. Babaliaros, Z. Junagadhwalla, S. Lerakis, V. Thourani, D. Liff, E. Chen, T. Vassiliades, C. Chappell, N. Gross, A. Patel, et al.
Use of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty to Size the Aortic Annulus Before Implantation of a Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.,
January 1, 2010;
3(1):
114 - 118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F Tops, V. Delgado, F. van der Kley, and J. J Bax
Percutaneous aortic valve therapy: clinical experience and the role of multi-modality imaging
Heart,
September 15, 2009;
95(18):
1538 - 1546.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Schultz, A. Weustink, N. Piazza, A. Otten, N. Mollet, G. Krestin, R. J. van Geuns, P. de Feyter, P. W.J. Serruys, and P. de Jaegere
Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 1, 2009;
54(10):
911 - 918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Rahimtoola
The Year in Valvular Heart Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
May 19, 2009;
53(20):
1894 - 1908.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Piazza, P. de Jaegere, C. Schultz, A. E. Becker, P. W. Serruys, and R. H. Anderson
Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve
Circ Cardiovasc Interv,
August 1, 2008;
1(1):
74 - 81.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|