This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Cheng, V. Articles by Berman, D. S. PubMed Articles by Cheng, V. Articles by Berman, D. S. Related Collections Related Article

Moving Beyond Binary Grading of Coronary Arterial Stenoses on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

Insights for the Imager and Referring Clinician

Victor Cheng, MD^_*,, Ariel Gutstein, MD, Arik Wolak, MD, Yasuyuki Suzuki, MD, Damini Dey, PhD, Heidi Gransar, MS^_*,, Louise E.J. Thomson, MD^_*,,, Sean W. Hayes, MD^_*,,, John D. Friedman, MD, FACC^_*,,, Daniel S. Berman, MD, FACC^_*,,,_*

^_* Department of Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.

^_* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Daniel S. Berman, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Taper Building Room 1258, Los Angeles, California 90048. (Email: daniel.berman{at}cshs.org).

Objectives: We evaluated the technical and clinical utility of visual 5-point coronary stenosis grading on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA).

Background: The binary approach used to assess coronary stenoses on CCTA does not adequately describe borderline obstructive lesions and limits full expression of clinically useful information.

Methods: From 84 patients who underwent CCTA and invasive angiography, we identified 278 native coronary segments with 25% stenosis on CCTA after excluding all <25% stenotic, stented, and uninterpretable segments. Fifty <25% stenotic segments were randomly selected as controls. Segmental stenosis severity on CCTA was consensually graded using a 0 to 5 scale (grade 0 = none, grade 1 = 1% to 24%, grade 2 = 25% to 49%, grade 3 = 50% to 69%, grade 4 = 70% to 89%, grade 5 = 90% to 100%) by 2 readers, using visual inspection and computed tomography–based quantification (CTQCA). Invasive angiography–based stenosis quantification (IQCA) was performed for all segments, using the same 0 to 5 scale to score stenosis severity.

Results: On CCTA, 185 (56%) segments had intermediate stenoses (grade 2 or grade 3). Stenosis severity by IQCA increased significantly with each step-up in CCTA grade (p < 0.001). CTQCA did not perform better than visual inspection. Visual CCTA stenosis grading differed from IQCA by >1 grade in only 4% of grade 2 to grade 5 segments (10 of 278; 2% of CCTA grade 2 segments, 4% of grade 3, 8% of grade 4, 2% of grade 5). Overall quantitative correlation was strong (r = 0.82) with high variability in agreement between CTQCA and IQCA for individual segments (95% of differences between 27.2% and 34.6%).

Conclusions: With current CCTA technology, experienced readers should consider adopting a visually based, multitiered grading approach to evaluate coronary stenoses. A 49% lesion on CCTA can be considered virtually exclusive of 70% stenosis by invasive angiography.

Key Words: coronary angiography • computed tomography • coronary artery disease • quantification • predictive value

Abbreviations and Acronyms   BMI = body mass index   CCTA = coronary computed tomographic angiography   CI = confidence interval   CTQCA = computed tomography–based quantitative coronary analysis   ICA = invasive coronary angiography   IQCA = invasive angiography–based quantitative coronary analysis

Related Article

Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Computed Tomography

Stephan Achenbach
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2008 1: 472-474. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Achenbach Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Computed Tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 472 - 474. [Full Text] [PDF]