Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:772-781, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.07.014
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN Interview
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Truong, Q. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Truong, Q. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, U.

Clinical Research

Quantitative Analysis of Intraventricular Dyssynchrony Using Wall Thickness by Multidetector Computed Tomography

Quynh A. Truong, MD*,*, Jagmeet P. Singh, MD, DPhil{dagger}, Christopher P. Cannon, MD{ddagger}, Ammar Sarwar, MD*, Khurram Nasir, MD, MPH*, Angelo Auricchio, MD, PhD§, Francesco F. Faletra, MD§, Antonio Sorgente, MD§, Cristina Conca, MD§, Tiziano Moccetti, MD§, Mark Handschumacher, BS{dagger}, Thomas J. Brady, MD*, Udo Hoffmann, MD, MPH*

* Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Quynh A. Truong, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 (Email: qtruong{at}partners.org).

Objectives: We sought to determine the feasibility of cardiac computed tomography (CT) to detect significant differences in the extent of left ventricular dyssynchrony in heart failure (HF) patients with wide QRS, HF patients with narrow QRS, and age-matched controls.

Background: The degree of mechanical dyssynchrony has been suggested as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. There have been no published reports of dyssynchrony assessment with the use of CT.

Methods: Thirty-eight subjects underwent electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced 64-slice multidetector CT. The left ventricular endocardial and epicardial boundaries were delineated from short-axis images reconstructed at 10% phase increments of the cardiac cycle. Global and segmental CT dyssynchrony metrics that used changes in wall thickness, wall motion, and volume over time were assessed for reproducibility. We defined a global metric using changes in wall thickness as the dyssynchrony index (DI).

Results: The DI was the most reproducible metric (interobserver and intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.94, p < 0.0001) and was used to determine differences between the 3 groups: HF-wide QRS group (ejection fraction [EF] 22 ± 8%, QRS 163 ± 28 ms), HF-narrow QRS (EF 26 ± 7%, QRS 96 ± 11 ms), and age-matched control subjects (EF 64 ± 5%, QRS 87 ± 9 ms). Mean DI was significantly different between the 3 groups (HF-wide QRS: 152 ± 44 ms, HF-narrow QRS: 121 ± 58 ms, and control subjects: 65 ± 12 ms; p < 0.0001) and greater in the HF-wide QRS (p < 0.0001) and HF-narrow QRS (p = 0.005) groups compared with control subjects. We found that DI had a good correlation with 2-dimensional (r = 0.65, p = 0.012) and 3-dimensional (r = 0.68, p = 0.008) echocardiographic dyssynchrony.

Conclusions: Quantitative assessment of global CT-derived DI, based on changes in wall thickness over time, is highly reproducible and renders significant differences between subjects most likely to have dyssynchrony and age-matched control subjects.

Key Words: imaging • tomography • heart failure • pacing • dyssynchrony

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  2D = two-dimensional
  3D = three-dimensional
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy
  CT = computed tomography
  DI = dyssynchrony index
  ECG = electrocardiography
  EF = ejection fraction
  HF = heart failure
  ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient
  LV = left ventricular




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
B. Heydari, M. Jerosch-Herold, and R. Y. Kwong
Imaging for Planning of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2012; 5(1): 93 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
S. Achenbach and J. Narula
Climbing Mount Everest "Because It's There!"
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2011; 4(3): 311 - 313.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
T. H. Marwick, S. V. Raman, I. Carrio, and J. J. Bax
Recent Developments in Heart Failure Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., April 1, 2010; 3(4): 429 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link