Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Prediction of Cardiac Events in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Martin Hadamitzky, MD*,*,
Barbara Freißmuth, MD*,
Tanja Meyer, MD*,
Franziska Hein, MD*,
Adnan Kastrati, MD*,
Stefan Martinoff, MD ,
Albert Schömig, MD*,
Jörg Hausleiter, MD*
* Klinik für Herz-und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Institut für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. med. Martin Hadamitzky, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Lazarettstrasse 36, München 80636, Germany (Email: mhy{at}dhm.mhn.de).
Objectives: We assessed the rate of cardiac events after detection or exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Background: Several studies have demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy of CCTA for detection of obstructive CAD compared with invasive angiography, but data regarding the clinical prognostic value of CCTA are limited.
Methods: In all, 1,256 consecutive patients with suspected CAD undergoing 64-slice CCTA in our institution between October 2004 and September 2006 were observed prospectively for the occurrence of severe cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization: primary study end point) and all cardiac events (additionally including revascularization >90 days after CCTA). The observed rate of all cardiac events was compared with the event rate predicted by the Framingham risk score. Obstructive CAD was defined as  50% diameter stenosis in any coronary artery.
Results: During a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range 14 to 25 months), the overall rates of severe and all cardiac events were 0.6% and 1.8%, respectively. In 802 patients without obstructive CAD, there were 4 cardiac events, of which 1 was severe, whereas in 348 patients with obstructive CAD, there were 17 cardiac events, of which 5 were severe. The difference between the 2 groups was highly significant both for severe events (odds ratio: 17.3, 95% confidence interval: 3.6 to 82.5) and for all cardiac events (odds ratio: 16.1, 95% confidence interval: 7.2 to 36.0; both p < 0.001). The rate of all cardiac events in patients without obstructive CAD was significantly lower than predicted by the Framingham risk score (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: In patients with suspected CAD, CCTA has a significant prognostic impact on the prediction of cardiac events for the subsequent 18 months. The exclusion of obstructive CAD by CCTA identifies a patient population with an event risk lower than predicted by conventional risk factors.
Key Words: coronary computed tomography angiography • coronary artery disease • prognosis
|
Abbreviations and Acronyms
| | CAD = coronary artery disease | | CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography | | CI = confidence interval | | CT = computed tomography |
|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
T. C. Villines, E. A. Hulten, L. J. Shaw, M. Goyal, A. Dunning, S. Achenbach, M. Al-Mallah, D. S. Berman, M. J. Budoff, F. Cademartiri, et al.
Prevalence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Adverse Events Among Symptomatic Patients With Coronary Artery Calcification Scores of Zero Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Results From the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 6, 2011;
58(24):
2533 - 2540.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Achenbach
Anatomy Meets Function: Modeling Coronary Flow Reserve on the Basis of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 1, 2011;
58(19):
1998 - 2000.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K. Min, A. Dunning, F. Y. Lin, S. Achenbach, M. Al-Mallah, M. J. Budoff, F. Cademartiri, T. Q. Callister, H.-J. Chang, V. Cheng, et al.
Age- and Sex-Related Differences in All-Cause Mortality Risk Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Findings: Results From the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
August 16, 2011;
58(8):
849 - 860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Y. Lin, L. J. Shaw, A. M. Dunning, T. M. LaBounty, J.-H. Choi, J. W. Weinsaft, S. Koduru, M. J. Gomez, A. J. Delago, T. Q. Callister, et al.
Mortality Risk in Symptomatic Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective 2-Center Study of 2,583 Patients Undergoing 64-Detector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 26, 2011;
58(5):
510 - 519.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. F. d. Azevedo, M. S. Hadlich, S. G. Bezerra, J. L. Petriz, R. R. Alves, O. de Souza, M. Rati, D. C. Albuquerque, and J. Moll
Prognostic Value of CT Angiography in Patients With Inconclusive Functional Stress Tests
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2011;
4(7):
740 - 751.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Bamberg, W. H. Sommer, V. Hoffmann, S. Achenbach, K. Nikolaou, D. Conen, M. F. Reiser, U. Hoffmann, and C. R. Becker
Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Long-Term Predictive Value of Assessment of Coronary Atherosclerosis by Contrast-Enhanced Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 14, 2011;
57(24):
2426 - 2436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Schlett, D. Banerji, E. Siegel, F. Bamberg, S. J. Lehman, M. Ferencik, T. J. Brady, J. T. Nagurney, U. Hoffmann, and Q. A. Truong
Prognostic Value of CT Angiography for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Acute Chest Pain From the Emergency Department: 2-Year Outcomes of the ROMICAT Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
May 1, 2011;
4(5):
481 - 491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Schoenhagen, R. Hachamovitch, and S. Achenbach
Coronary CT Angiography and Comparative Effectiveness Research: Prognostic Value of Atherosclerotic Disease Burden in Appropriately Indicated Clinical Examinations
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
May 1, 2011;
4(5):
492 - 495.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Voros, S. Rinehart, Z. Qian, P. Joshi, G. Vazquez, C. Fischer, P. Belur, E. Hulten, and T. C. Villines
Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging by Coronary CT Angiography: Current Status, Correlation With Intravascular Interrogation and Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
May 1, 2011;
4(5):
537 - 548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Achenbach, T. Goroll, M. Seltmann, T. Pflederer, K. Anders, D. Ropers, W. G. Daniel, M. Uder, M. Lell, and M. Marwan
Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Low-Dose, Prospectively ECG-Triggered, High-Pitch Spiral Coronary CT Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
April 1, 2011;
4(4):
328 - 337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Hulten, S. Carbonaro, S. P. Petrillo, J. D. Mitchell, and T. C. Villines
Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
March 8, 2011;
57(10):
1237 - 1247.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. van Werkhoven, J. D. Schuijf, A. P. Pazhenkottil, B. A. Herzog, J. R. Ghadri, J. W. Jukema, E. Boersma, L. J. Kroft, A. de Roos, P. A. Kaufmann, et al.
Influence of smoking on the prognostic value of cardiovascular computed tomography coronary angiography
Eur. Heart J.,
February 1, 2011;
32(3):
365 - 370.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Achenbach, C. M. Kramer, W. A. Zoghbi, and V. Dilsizian
The Year in Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
October 1, 2010;
3(10):
1065 - 1077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Shaw, J. K. Min, R. Hachamovitch, E. D. Peterson, R. C. Hendel, P. K. Woodard, D. S. Berman, and P. S. Douglas
Cardiovascular Imaging Research at the Crossroads
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
March 1, 2010;
3(3):
316 - 324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The Year in Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
February 2, 2010;
55(5):
483 - 495.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Achenbach and J. Ludwig
Is CT the Better Angiogram?: Coronary Interventions and CT Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
January 1, 2010;
3(1):
29 - 31.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Achenbach
Stress Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion: Steps, Questions, and Layers
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
September 15, 2009;
54(12):
1085 - 1087.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rassi Jr
Prognostic Utility of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Are We Looking at the Correct Outcomes and Making Appropriate Comparisons?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2009;
2(7):
914 - 914.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hadamitzky
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
July 1, 2009;
2(7):
915 - 915.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Shaw and J. Narula
Bridging the Detection Gap Chasm of Risk: Where Can Computed Tomography Angiography Take Us?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img.,
April 1, 2009;
2(4):
524 - 526.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
