Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:580-588, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.029
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibrahim, T.
Right arrow Articles by Botnar, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ibrahim, T.
Right arrow Articles by Botnar, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Serial Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demonstrates Regression of Hyperenhancement Within the Coronary Artery Wall in Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Tareq Ibrahim, MD*, Markus R. Makowski, MD{dagger}, Antanas Jankauskas, MD{dagger}, David Maintz, MD§, Martin Karch, MD*, Sylvia Schachoff, RT{dagger}, Warren J. Manning, MD{ddagger}, Albert Schömig, MD*, Markus Schwaiger, MD{dagger}, Rene M. Botnar, PhD{dagger},*

* Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik des Klinikums Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
{dagger} Nuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
{ddagger} Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Radiologische Klinik, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Rene M. Botnar, PhD, Division of Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 4th Floor, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom (Email: rene.botnar{at}kcl.ac.uk).

Objectives: Our aim was to determine whether serial contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CE-CMR) is useful for the characterization of tissue signal changes within the coronary vessel wall in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Background: Inflammation plays a key role in the development of AMI. CE-CMR of the vessel wall has been found useful for the characterization of inflammatory tissue signal changes in patients with carotid artery stenosis, giant cell arteritis, or Takayasu's arteritis; however, it has never been serially performed in the coronary artery wall in patients with acute and chronic myocardial infarction using a gadolinium-based contrast medium and compared with systemic markers of inflammation.

Methods: CE-CMR using a T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient echo inversion recovery sequence of the coronary artery wall and 0.2 mmol/kg of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid was performed in 10 patients with AMI 6 days and 3 months after coronary intervention and in 9 subjects without coronary artery disease on invasive coronary angiography. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) within the coronary artery wall was quantified in comparison with blood signal.

Results: Patients with AMI demonstrated a significantly increased coronary vessel wall enhancement 6 days after infarction compared with normal subjects (CNR 7.8 ± 4.4 vs. 5.3 ± 3.2, p < 0.001). Three months after infarction, CNR decreased to 6.5 ± 4.7 (p < 0.03). This decrease paralleled declines in C-reactive protein. Angiographically normal segments showed no contrast changes, but CNR significantly decreased in stenotic segments, from 10.9 ± 3.8 to 6.8 ± 5.0 (p < 0.002), resulting in a reduction of enhanced segments from 70% to 25% (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Serial CE-CMR identified changes in spatial extent and intensity of coronary contrast enhancement in patients after AMI. This technique may be useful for the characterization of transient coronary tissue signal changes, which may represent edema or inflammation during the post-infarction phase. In addition, CE-CMR may offer the potential for visualization of inflammatory activity in atherosclerosis associated with acute coronary syndromes.

Key Words: cardiac magnetic resonance • late enhancement • coronary artery • acute myocardial infarction

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACS = acute coronary syndromes
  AMI = acute myocardial infarction
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CE-CMR = contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance
  CRP = C-reactive protein
  LCA = left coronary artery
  LCX = left circumflex artery
  SI = signal intensity


Related Article

Can Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assess Inflammation of the Coronary Wall?
Debiao Li, Zahi A. Fayad, and David A. Bluemke
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2009 2: 589-591. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Sanz, P. R. Moreno, and V. Fuster
The Year in Atherothrombosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 6, 2010; 55(14): 1487 - 1498.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
C. M. Kramer and J. Narula
Atherosclerotic Plaque Imaging: The Last Frontier for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 916 - 918.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
D. Li, Z. A. Fayad, and D. A. Bluemke
Can contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance assess inflammation of the coronary wall?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 589 - 591.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link