Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:846-854, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.04.009
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Keeping an Eye on Imaging on CVN
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorbala, S.
Right arrow Articles by Di Carli, M. F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dorbala, S.
Right arrow Articles by Di Carli, M. F.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Incremental Prognostic Value of Gated Rb-82 Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Over Clinical Variables and Rest LVEF

Sharmila Dorbala, MD*,{dagger},*, Rory Hachamovitch, MD, MSc{ddagger}, Zelmira Curillova, MD*,{dagger}, Deepak Thomas, MD*, Divya Vangala*, Raymond Y. Kwong, MD{dagger}, Marcelo F. Di Carli, MD*,{dagger}

* Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Los Angeles, California

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Sharmila Dorbala, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cardiovascular Faculty Offices, Shapiro 5, Room 128, 70 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 (Email: sdorbala{at}partners.org).

Objectives: This investigation sought to study the incremental value of gated rubidium (Rb)-82 positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) over clinical variables for predicting survival and future cardiac events.

Background: The prognostic value of Rb-82 PET-MPI and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reserve (stress minus rest LVEF) is not well defined.

Methods: 1,432 consecutive patients undergoing gated rest/vasodilator stress rubidium-82 PET were followed up for at least 1 year. Of these, rest and peak stress LVEF and LVEF reserve were available in 985 patients. Cardiac events (CE) including cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction and all-cause death were assessed.

Results: Over a mean follow-up of 1.7 ± 0.7 years, 83 (5.8%) CE and 140 (9.7%) all-cause death were observed. There was an increase in risk for both end points with an increasing percentage of abnormal and ischemic myocardium. With normal, mild, moderate, or severely ischemic scans, the observed annualized rates of CE were 0.7%, 5.5%, 5%, and 11% and of all-cause death were 3.3%, 7.2%, 6.9%, and 12.5%, respectively. In 985 patients with peak stress gated data, the observed annualized rates of CE (2.1% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001) and all-cause death (4.3% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with an LVEF reserve <0% compared with those with an LVEF reserve ≥0%. On Cox proportional hazards analysis, after consideration of clinical, historical, and rest LVEF information, stress PET results and LVEF reserve yielded incremental prognostic value with respect to both CE and all-cause death.

Conclusions: Vasodilator stress Rb-82 PET-MPI provides incremental prognostic value to historical/clinical variables and rest LVEF to predict survival free of CE and all-cause death. An increasing percentage of ischemia on PET-MPI is associated with an increase in the risk of CE and all-cause death. Left ventricular ejection fraction reserve provides significant independent and incremental value to Rb-82 MPI for predicting the risk of future adverse events.

Key Words: prognosis • imaging • tomography

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CE = cardiac events
  CT = computed tomography
  EF = ejection fraction
  LV = left ventricular
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MPI = myocardial perfusion imaging
  PET = positron emission tomography
  Rb = rubidium
  ROC = receiver-operator characteristic
  SDS = summed difference score
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography
  SRS = summed rest score
  SSS = summed stress score


Related Article

Establishing the Prognostic Value of Rb-82 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Step in the Right Direction
Raymond J. Gibbons and Panithaya Chareonthaitawee
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2009 2: 855-857. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
R. J. Gibbons and P. Chareonthaitawee
Establishing the Prognostic Value of Rb-82 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Step in the Right Direction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 855 - 857.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link