Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:940-946, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.015
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Go to related CVN interview Interview
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bischoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hausleiter, J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bischoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hausleiter, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Impact of a Reduced Tube Voltage on CT Angiography and Radiation Dose

Results of the PROTECTION I Study

Bernhard Bischoff, MD*, Franziska Hein, MD*, Tanja Meyer, MD*, Martin Hadamitzky, MD*, Stefan Martinoff, MD{dagger}, Albert Schömig, MD*, Jörg Hausleiter, MD*,*

* Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik an der TU München, Munich, Germany
{dagger} Institut für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik an der TU München, Munich, Germany

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Jörg Hausleiter, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 München, Germany (Email: hausleiter{at}dhm.mhn.de).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a reduced 100-kV tube voltage on image quality and radiation exposure in a pre-defined subgroup analysis of the international, multicenter radiation dose survey PROTECTION I (Prospective Multicenter Study on RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of Cardiac CT AngIOgraphy I) study.

Background: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has become a frequently used diagnostic tool in clinical practice. Despite continually improving CT technology, there remain concerns regarding the associated radiation exposure. A reduced tube voltage of 100 kV has been proposed as an effective means for dose reduction in nonobese patients.

Methods: The study assessed the relevant radiation dose parameters as well as quantitative and qualitative diagnostic image quality data in a subgroup of 321 patients (100 kV: 82 patients; 120 kV: 239 patients), who were scanned at study sites that applied a 100-kV tube voltage in at least 1 patient. Diagnostic image quality was assessed by an experienced CCTA investigator with a 4-point score (1: nondiagnostic to 4: excellent image quality). Effective radiation dose was estimated from the dose-length-product of each CCTA study.

Results: The use of the 100-kV scan protocol was associated with 53% reduction in CCTA median radiation dose estimates, when compared with the conventional 120-kV scan protocol (p < 0.001). Although image noise significantly increased by 26.3% with 100 kV, signal- as well as contrast-to-noise ratios also increased by 7.9% (p = 0.254) and 10.8% (p = 0.027), respectively. Reduction of tube voltage did not impair diagnostic image quality (median diagnostic score: 3.5 [3.25 to 3.75] vs. 3.5 [3.0 to 3.75] for 100 kV vs. 120 kV; p = 0.22).

Conclusions: In this nonrandomized PROTECTION I dose survey, reducing the CCTA tube voltage to 100 kV in nonobese patients is associated with a significant reduction in radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Thus, the 100-kV scan technique should be considered for CCTA dose reduction in adequately selected patients.

Key Words: computed tomography • coronary artery disease • tube voltage

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  BMI = body mass index
  CCTA = cardiac computed tomography angiography
  CT = computed tomography
  DLP = dose-length-product
  ECG = electrocardiography


Related Article

CT Angiography by Reduced Tube Voltage: More Than a Single Step
James K. Min and Troy M. LaBounty
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2009 2: 947-949. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
J. K. Min and T. M. LaBounty
CT Angiography by Reduced Tube Voltage: More Than a Single Step
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., August 1, 2009; 2(8): 947 - 949.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link