Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2010; 3:734-745, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.06.001
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hakeem, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hakeem, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Renal Function and Risk Stratification of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Coronary Artery Disease

Abdul Hakeem, MD*,*, Sabha Bhatti, MD*, Kunal N. Karmali, MD{dagger}, Kathryn S. Dillie, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Jeffrey R. Cook, MD{dagger}, Jiaqiong Xu, PhD§, Zainab Samad, MD, MHS||, Su Min Chang, MD

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
{dagger} Department of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics and William S. Middleton VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
{ddagger} Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
§ Center for Biostatistics, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas
|| Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, the Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Abdul Hakeem, University of Cincinnati Hospital, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Academic Health Center, PO Box 670542, Cincinnati, Ohio 45257-0542 (Email: ahakeem{at}gmail.com).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of renal function by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on risk stratification of diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by single-photon emission computed tomography for suspected ischemia.

Background: Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death among diabetic persons; however, diabetic persons are a very heterogeneous group in terms of cardiovascular risk, necessitating further risk stratification.

Methods: Patients (n = 1,747, age 65 ± 10 years, 37% diabetic) undergoing MPI were followed for cardiac death (CD) for a mean of 2.15 ± 0.8 years. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined by an eGFR <60 ml/min.

Results: In the presence of a normal scan, annual CD rate was 0.9% for those with no diabetes mellitus (DM) and no CKD, 0.5% in the DM alone group, 2.35% in CKD alone, and 2.9% in those with both DM and CKD (p < 0.001). Patients with DM+CKD had a 2.7-fold risk of CD compared with no DM no CKD (p = 0.001) after controlling for age, ejection fraction, history of coronary artery disease, and other risk factors. The risk of CD increased as a function of the presence and severity of perfusion defects, regardless of CKD or DM status. Presence of CKD conferred a several-fold higher risk of CD for the various strata of perfusion defects. Log-rank test for difference in probability of CD was nonsignificant for comparison between patients with no DM no CKD and those with DM alone (p = 0.73) but was significant for comparison between patients with no DM no CKD and patients with CKD alone (p < 0.001) or DM+CKD (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: MPI and eGFR provide valuable risk stratification for diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Diabetic patients without CKD seem to have similar short-term cardiac outcomes compared with nondiabetic patients. Underlying CKD seems to identify a high-risk subgroup of diabetic patients.

Key Words: diabetic • renal function • risk stratification

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  ACM = all-cause mortality
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  CD = cardiac death
  CI = confidence interval
  CKD = chronic kidney disease
  DM = diabetes mellitus
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  EF = ejection fraction
  eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate
  HR = hazard ratio
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MPI = myocardial perfusion imaging
  NFMI = nonfatal myocardial infarction
  SDS = summed difference score
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography
  SRS = summed rest score
  SSS = summed stress score


Related Article

Chronic Kidney Disease as a Potent Risk Modifier for CAD in Diabetics
Jeffrey C. Fink
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2010 3: 746-748. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
J. M. Bourque and G. A. Beller
Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Assessing Prognosis: An Update
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., December 1, 2011; 4(12): 1305 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
J. C. Fink
Chronic Kidney Disease as a Potent Risk Modifier for CAD in Diabetics
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2010; 3(7): 746 - 748.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link