Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:29-38, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.10.006
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sengupta, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Khandheria, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sengupta, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Khandheria, B. K.

Disparate Patterns of Left Ventricular Mechanics Differentiate Constrictive Pericarditis From Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

Partho P. Sengupta, MD*,1, Vijay K. Krishnamoorthy, MD{dagger}, Walter P. Abhayaratna, MBBS{dagger}, Josef Korinek, MD{dagger}, Marek Belohlavek, MD, PhD*, Thoralf M. Sundt, III, MD{dagger}, Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran, MD*, Farouk Mookadam, MD*, James B. Seward, MD{dagger}, A. Jamil Tajik, MD*, Bijoy K. Khandheria, MD*,*

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
{dagger} Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Relationship Between Left Ventricular Circumferential Strain and Radial Displacement

We used 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for determining circumferential strain (x-axis) and radial displacement (y-axis) in patients with constrictive pericarditis (CP), patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), and control subjects (CON). Each plotted value represents peak end-systolic circumferential strain and radial displacement values averaged from apex, mid, and basal segments for 3 consecutive heartbeats. On combining the data from the 3 groups, peak radial displacement showed good correlation with peak circumferential shortening strains.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Relationship Between LV Circumferential Strain and Net Ventricular Twist

Peak end-systolic circumferential strain (x-axis) was averaged from basal, mid, and apical short-axis views for 3 consecutive heartbeats. Rotations in either the basal or apical short-axis planes were expressed as average angular displacements of 6 myocardial segments along the central axis. Net left ventricular (LV) twist (y-axis) was calculated as the net difference between LV peak rotation angles obtained from the basal and apical short-axis planes and averaged over 3 consecutive heartbeats. On combining the data from the 3 groups (CP, RCM, and CON), a good correlation was seen between peak circumferential shortening strains and peak net ventricular twist. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Longitudinal Versus Circumferential LV Mechanics

Distribution of peak early diastolic longitudinal velocity (A), longitudinal displacement of the LV base (B), peak early diastolic apical untwisting velocity (C), and net ventricular twist (D) has been shown for patients with CP and RCM. In comparison with RCM, patients with CP had significantly higher longitudinal early diastolic velocity (Em) and markedly attenuated untwisting velocity (Er). Both velocities, when considered in isolation, however, show substantial overlap (Em: 21 of 45 [47%]; longitudinal displacement: 36 of 45 [80%]; Er: 23 of 45 [51%]; LV torsion: 24 of 45 [53%]). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis of Longitudinal and Torsional LV Mechanics

Receiver-operating characteristic curves of Em, Er, and net LV twist (T) have been plotted for differentiating CP from RCM. Optimal cut-off value for Em was 5 cm/s (92% sensitivity and 90% specificity); Er was –50°/s (57% sensitivity and 95% specificity); and net LV twist was 10° (83% sensitivity and 84% specificity). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was significantly higher for early diastolic longitudinal velocities as compared with early diastolic untwisting velocities (p = 0.01). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 to 3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 LV Longitudinal Velocity and Untwisting Velocity in CP and RCM

Color M-mode display of apical untwisting velocity (rotational rate of the LV apex [RotR]) obtained from speckle tracking of the LV apex in short-axis view shows markedly attenuated early diastolic rate of untwisting in CP (A, arrows), whereas longitudinal early diastolic velocities (VL) from the LV base in apical 4-chamber view (B, arrows) are normal. In contrast, patients with RCM show a normal early diastolic rate of untwisting (C, arrows) and reduced longitudinal early diastolic velocities from the LV base (D, arrows). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Comparison of Peak Longitudinal Early Diastolic Velocity With Peak Early Diastolic Untwisting Velocity

Early diastolic velocity >–5 cm/s and/or early diastolic apical untwisting velocity –50°/s separated the patients with CP and RCM with overlapping values seen in only 1 patient with CP. This finding provides a rationale for combining longitudinal early diastolic velocities with rotational untwisting velocities for differentiating the 2 disparate patterns of diastolic restoration mechanics seen in CP and RCM. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link