Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:49-57, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.09.002
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JACC Imaging
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raman, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Zweier, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Raman, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Zweier, J. L.

In Vivo Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization Using Magnetic Susceptibility Distinguishes Symptom-Producing Plaques

Subha V. Raman, MD, MS, FACC*,*, Marshall W. Winner, III, MD*, Tam Tran, BS*, Murugesan Velayutham, PhD*, Orlando P. Simonetti, PhD*, Peter B. Baker, MD{dagger}, John Olesik, PhD{ddagger}, Beth McCarthy, RT*, Amy K. Ferketich, PhD§, Jay L. Zweier, MD, FACC*

* Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute and Heart Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
{dagger} Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
{ddagger} School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
§ School of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 LDL Peroxidation Catalyzed by Iron

The Haber-Weiss reaction and Fenton chemistry use iron in generating free radicals that oxidize low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Microhemorrhage into atherosclerotic plaque with macrophage-mediated phagocytosis and degradation of aged red blood cells leads to accumulation of redox-active iron. Oxidized LDL binds the macrophage scavenger-receptor, leading to unregulated uptake, foam cell formation, and accelerated atherogenesis.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 T2*-Weighted Imaging and Intraplaque T2* Measurement

Serial T2*-weighted dark blood images at various echo times (A, echo time [TE] 2.7 ms; B, TE 7.6 ms; C, TE 12.5 ms; D, TE 17.4 ms) obtained at the location of maximum stenosis allow drawing of a region of interest (D) on all the images encompassing the plaque for measurement of mean T2* within the plaque. See the text for T2* imaging scan parameters. (E) T2* is measured in a given plaque by fitting the measured signal intensities at each TE to an exponential decay curve e–TE/T2*. ECA = external carotid artery; ICA = internal carotid artery; J = internal jugular vein; VA = vertebral artery.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Intraplaque T2* by Symptom Status

(A) Plot of in vivo magnetic resonance-derived T2* values of carotid artery plaque in asymptomatic versus symptomatic patients shows shorter T2* times in symptomatic patients. Mean ± SD is shown. (B) Bland-Altman analysis shows good agreement of carotid T2* measurement between independent observers (r = 0.88).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 EPR Spectroscopy Detection of Iron in Carotid Plaques

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is a powerful and minimally invasive technique to identify and quantify the presence of paramagnetic ferric iron [Fe(III)] within an explanted carotid specimen. The EPR spectra were recorded on frozen tissue at 77 K. For further experimental details and spectrometer settings, see the Methods section. Representative EPR spectra from control carotid artery (A), asymptomatic patient’s carotid plaque (B), and symptomatic patient’s carotid plaque (C) are shown. Atherosclerotic plaque samples demonstrate the high-spin rhombic iron species peak at a magnetic field of ~1,500 Gauss, corresponding to a g value of 4.3. Although no rhombic iron signal was observed in control carotid tissue, a prominent signal was present in asymptomatic patients’ carotid plaques; however, in symptomatic patients’ plaques, the level of this signal was significantly decreased.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Plaque Histopathology

(Left) Histopathological section with Prussian blue staining at low and high (inset) magnifications demonstrates iron deposits in plaque. (Middle) Staining for glycophorin A shows evidence of red blood cell membrane fragments within plaque. (Right) Staining for Factor VIII demonstrates neovascularization in the plaque neointima.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Model of Hypothesized Mechanism Underlying Observed Results

Although our work demonstrated similar total iron in symptom-producing versus non–symptom-producing carotid plaques, the former group had less paramagnetic iron by EPR and greater T2*-shortening iron species. This difference suggests a shift from paramagnetic Fe(III) to iron aggregates that have a greater effect on local magnetic susceptibility, measurable using the tissue-specific magnetic resonance imaging relaxation time T2*. Abbreviations as in Figure 4.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link