Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:61-69, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.09.001
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN Interview
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JACC Imaging
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M.
Right arrow Articles by Budoff, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M.
Right arrow Articles by Budoff, M.

Prognostic Value of Number and Site of Calcified Coronary Lesions Compared With the Total Score

Marcus Williams, MD*, Leslee J. Shaw, PhD*,*, Paolo Raggi, MD*, Douglas Morris, MD*, Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD*, Sandy T. Liu, MD{dagger}, Steven R. Weinstein, MD{dagger}, Tristen P. Mosler, MD{dagger}, Philip H. Tseng, MD{dagger}, Ferdinand R. Flores, MD{dagger}, Khurram Nasir, MD, MPH{dagger}, Matthew Budoff, MD{dagger}

* Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
{dagger} Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 The Frequency of Calcified Lesions by Coronary Artery

This figure plots the percent of patients with the total number of calcified lesions for the left anterior descending (LAD), left main (LM), right coronary (RCA), and left circumflex (LCx) coronary arteries. The total number of lesions varies by the epicardial coronary artery but ranges from 1 to 23 lesions. Any lesion was more frequent in the LAD but also common in the RCA and LCx coronary arteries. Only 0.6% of patients had 3 or more lesions in the LM coronary artery.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Risk-Adjusted Annual Mortality (95% Confidence Intervals) by the Number of Calcified Lesions

This figure plots predicted or risk-adjusted annual mortality rates, including 95% confidence intervals, by the number of calcified lesions. These results are based on data from a Cox proportional hazards multivariable model that included the number of calcified lesions plus cardiac risk factors. There is a directly proportional relationship between mortality risk and the number of calcified lesions such that mortality rates increase in patients with more frequent calcified lesions.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Risk-Adjusted Annual Mortality for CAC Score Subsets by the Number of Calcified Lesions CAC ≥100

This figure plots predicted or risk-adjusted annual mortality rates by the number of calcified lesions in the LAD or LM, RCA, and LCx coronary arteries. These results are based on data from a Cox proportional hazards multivariable model that included the number of calcified lesions plus cardiac risk factors. For all coronary arteries, mortality rates are higher for patients with more frequent calcified lesions. However, mortality rates were highest for patients with calcified lesions in the LAD or LM coronary arteries. CAC = coronary artery calcium; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Cumulative Risk-Adjusted Cox Survival for Patients with 1 Calcified Lesion (n = 5,165)

This survival curve is based on a Cox proportional hazards univariable regression model that includes only patients with 1 calcified lesion. These results indicate that patients with large coronary artery calcium scores, in that 1 lesion, had worse cumulative survival (p < 0.0001).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Risk-Adjusted Annual Mortality for CAC Score Subsets by the Number of Calcified Lesions

This figure plots predicted or risk-adjusted annual mortality rates by the number of calcified lesions and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score results. These results are based on data from a Cox proportional hazards multivariable model that included the number of calcified lesions, the CAC score, and cardiac risk factors. Although mortality rates increased for patients with more frequent lesions as well as for those with higher CAC scores, mortality rates were highest for patients with few, very large calcified lesions.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 ROC Curves for the Total Number of Calcified Lesions Compared With the Agatston Score

The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots the sensitivity (y-axis) by 1 – specificity (or false positive rate, x-axis) for both the total number of lesions and the Agatston or coronary artery calcium score. These results reveal a similar ability to classify mortality risk for both the Agatston score and the number of calcified lesions.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link