Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:190-199, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.003
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuijf, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schuijf, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bax, J. J.

Invasive Versus Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease

Joanne D. Schuijf, PhD*, Jacob M. van Werkhoven, MSc*,{ddagger}, Gabija Pundziute, MD*, J. Wouter Jukema, MD, PhD*,{ddagger}, Isabel Decramer, MSc||, Marcel P. Stokkel, PhD, MD§, Petra Dibbets-Schneider, MSc§, Martin J. Schalij, MD, PhD*, Johannes H.C. Reiber, PhD{dagger}, Ernst E. van der Wall, MD, PhD{ddagger}, William Wijns, MD, PhD||, Jeroen J. Bax, MD, PhD*,*

* Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
{ddagger} The Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
§ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
|| The Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.


Figure 1
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 MDCT and QCA Findings in 70 Patients With Abnormal and Normal MPI Results, Respectively

Note the discrepancy between the imaging modalities in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). In most of these patients, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was abnormal, with no significant difference in the number of segments with atherosclerosis either (as compared with patients with abnormal perfusion. However, number of significantly stenosed segments was significantly lower in patients with normal MPI, as also reflected by minimal luminal narrowing on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). *Average in patients with atherosclerosis on MDCT.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 MPI, MDCT, and QCA Observations in 49 Patients in Whom Additional IVUS Imaging Was Performed

In almost all patients with normal MPI, the presence of atherosclerosis was observed on MDCT with negligible luminal narrowing identified on QCA. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging confirmed the presence of substantial atherosclerosis (mean lesion plaque burden 58.9%), yet without luminal compromise (mean minimal lumen area [MLA] 5.8 mm2). Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Coronary Artery Disease by MDCT Coronary Angiography With Normal Myocardial Perfusion

A 60-year old male presented to the outpatient clinic with dyspnea and an elevated risk profile for coronary artery disease, including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography revealed considerable atherosclerosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery (A). B and C are cross-sectional images of the areas indicated by the arrows in (A). In contrast, myocardial perfusion imaging (D), which was performed during exercise stress (first and third row) and rest (second and fourth row), showed normal perfusion. On intravascular ultrasound imaging (E and F), considerable plaque burden was demonstrated, yet with preserved coronary lumen.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Differences in IVUS Measurements Between Coronary Arteries With CAD and Without CAD as Determined on MDCT

(A) MLA (mm2) and corrected lumen area stenosis (%) and (B) plaque area (mm2) and plaque burden (%). All measurements were significantly different between coronary arteries with and without coronary artery disease (CAD) identified on MDCT. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link