Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:210-220, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.002
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.
Right arrow Articles by Beppu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.
Right arrow Articles by Beppu, S.

Assessment of Dyssynchronous Wall Motion During Acute Myocardial Ischemia Using Velocity Vector Imaging

Kasumi Masuda, MSc, Toshihiko Asanuma, MD, Asuka Taniguchi, MSc, Ayumi Uranishi, MSc, Fuminobu Ishikura, MD, FACC, Shintaro Beppu, MD, FACC*

Division of Functional Diagnostic Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 End-Diastolic and End-Systolic Short-Axis Images in a Representative Dog

The short-axis images at baseline and during stenosis and occlusion of the left circumflex artery (LCx). In this dog model, the center of the LCx region is located at the 2 to 3 o’clock position of the short-axis view (wall thickness in the center of the risk area is indicated by arrows). Note that end-systolic wall thickness seemed to be preserved during stenosis.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 VVIs at Mid-Systole and MVO at Baseline and During Stenosis and Occlusion

The velocity vector images (VVIs) in the same dog as that shown in Figure 1. At mid-systole, inward velocity vectors became smaller in the risk area during occlusion but were not reduced during stenosis. At mitral valve opening (MVO), inward velocity vectors were revealed in the risk area during occlusion. Even during stenosis, outward velocity vectors were clearly reduced in the risk area. The transducer icon represents a reference point for calculation of radial velocity.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Profiles of Radial Myocardial Velocity

Profiles of radial velocity from peak R on the electrocardiogram throughout 1 cardiac cycle in the same dog as shown in Figures 1 and 2. Positive values represent inward wall motion and negative values represent outward wall motion. Yellow and orange velocity profiles are derived from the risk area and the normal perfused area, respectively. Although peak systolic radial velocity (VSYS) in the risk area decreased during occlusion, it did not change during stenosis. In contrast, radial velocity at mitral valve opening (VMVO) gradually increased in proportion to the severity of ischemia. AVC = aortic valve closure; MVO = mitral valve opening.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis

Receiver operating characteristic curves of the percent change in wall thickening (%WT), peak systolic radial strain, VSYS, and VMVO for the detection of occlusion and stenosis from values in the risk area only and the ratio between values in the normal and risk areas. The VMVO parameter could detect myocardial ischemia with better sensitivity and specificity than %WT, peak systolic radial strain, and VSYS. Abbreviations as in Figure 3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Comparison of MCE and VVI

Images at MVO derived from myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and VVI during occlusion of the left circumflex artery in a representative dog. The area indicating inward velocity vectors at MVO corresponded closely with the contrast defect area derived from MCE. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Spatial Extent of Post-Systolic Inward Motion Detected by VVI

Relationship between the spatial extents of the risk area derived from MCE and the post-systolic inward motion detected by VVI during coronary occlusion. The spatial extent of post-systolic inward motion detected by VVI significantly correlated with that of the risk area with a linear regression. Abbreviations as in Figures 2 and 5.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link