Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:307-316, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.02.003
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Appendix
Right arrow View CVN Interview
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerqueira, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cerqueira, M. D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Effects of Age, Gender, Obesity, and Diabetes on the Efficacy and Safety of the Selective A2A Agonist Regadenoson Versus Adenosine in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Integrated ADVANCE-MPI Trial Results

Manuel D. Cerqueira, MD, FACC*,*, Patricia Nguyen, MD{dagger}, Peter Staehr, MD{dagger}, S. Richard Underwood, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Ami E. Iskandrian, MD, MACC§ on behalf of the ADVANCE-MPI Trial Investigators

* Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
{dagger} Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Inc., Palo Alto, California
{ddagger} Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England
§ University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Agreement Rates for Ischemia in Combined ADVANCE MPI 1 and 2

In 1,871 subjects, 3 blinded experts independently scored images on a 5-point scale using 17-segments and ischemia was categorized as 0 to 1 (no to minimal), 2 to 4 (small to moderate), or ≥5 (large). The overall average ischemia agreement rates between adenosine–adenosine and adenosine–regadenoson was 0.62 ± 0.03 and 0.63 ± 0.02 with an agreement difference of 0% (95% CI –6.2% to 6.8%), respectively. Regadenoson was noninferior to adenosine for detection of ischemia. ADVANCE MPI= ADenoscan Versus regAdenosoN Comparative Evaluation for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; CI = confidence interval; SE = standard error.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Comparison of SSS and SDS for Initial Adenosine and Randomized Scan

Using the rounded average of 3 readers for adenosine-adenosine and adenosine-regadenoson scoring, mean summed stress score (SSS) (A) and summed difference score (SDS) (B) differences were close to 0 and standard deviations (SDs) were similar for the 2 arms for the ADVANCE MPI 1 and 2 trials. The differences between the initial adenosine and randomization to regadenoson were no different than randomization to repeat adenosine. Results of ADVANCE MPI 1 are shown.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link