Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:424-433, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.05.004
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gropler, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gropler, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Impact of Gender on the Myocardial Metabolic Response to Obesity

Linda R. Peterson, MD, FACC*,{dagger},{ddagger},*, Pablo F. Soto, MD*,{ddagger}, Pilar Herrero, ME, MS{ddagger}, B. Selma Mohammed, MD, PhD{dagger}, Michael S. Avidan, MBBCh§, Kenneth B. Schechtman, PhD||, Carmen Dence, MS{ddagger}, Robert J. Gropler, MD, FACC*,{ddagger}

* Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
{dagger} Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
{ddagger} Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
§ Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
|| Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 MBF and MVO2 in obese and nonobese men and women

Panel A shows MBF, which we quantified using positron emission tomography, in the 4 subject groups. The p values for the pairwise comparisons are shown. The obese women had the greatest MBF, which was significantly greater than in the nonobese women or the obese men. The nonobese women also had greater resting MBF than the nonobese men. Panel B shows MVO2 levels in the groups, as determined with the utilization of positron emission tomography. Obese women had the greatest MVO2, which was significantly greater than the nonobese women and the obese men. Nonobese women also had greater MVO2 than the nonobese men. MBF = myocardial blood flow; MVO2 = oxygen consumption.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 MBF Versus BMI in Men and Women

This figure demonstrates the relationships between MBF, quantified using positron emission tomography, and BMI in men and in women. The correlations between BMI and MBF were only significant in the women. However, r values for the correlations of BMI with MBF in men and women were not statistically different. BMI = body mass index; MBF = myocardial blood flow.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 MVO2 Versus BMI in Men and Women

These graphs show how MVO2, quantified using positron emission tomography, relates to increasing BMI in men and in women. The correlation between MVO2 and BMI was only significant in the women. However, r values for the correlations in men and women were not statistically different. BMI = body mass index; MVO2 = oxygen consumption.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Typical PET Images and Time-Activity Curves

Top left, typical positron emission tomography (PET)-derived, horizontal long-axis image from the myocardium of a nonobese man in our study after injection with 1-11C-acetate. Compared with the nonobese man, the PET-derived image after 1-11C-acetate from an obese women's myocardium shows greater tracer accumulation in the myocardium (more white and red graphically indicate greater counts in the woman's myocardium, corresponding to greater tracer uptake). Bottom panels, blood (dashed lines) and myocardial time-activity curves (solid lines) from the corresponding PET images, which were used in conjunction with compartmental models to quantify MVO2.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Myocardial Glucose Uptake and Glucose Utilization/Plasma Insulin

Panels A and B show the groups' myocardial glucose uptake and glucose utilization/plasma insulin, respectively. Glucose uptake and utilization were measured with positron emission tomography and insulin with a radioimmunoassay. Obesity's and gender's significant interaction in the prediction of glucose uptake (p < 0.05) is shown graphically because both the magnitude and direction of the effect of obesity on myocardial glucose uptake differ in men and women. Obese men have lower uptake than nonobese men; obese women, however, have greater uptake than nonobese women. Obesity and gender also interacted in determining glucose utilization/plasma insulin (p = 0.01), as shown by the magnitude of the difference between the obese and nonobese men and that between the obese and nonobese women.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Myocardial FA Uptake and Metabolism

Shown is a depiction of the groups' myocardial fatty acid (FA) uptake (A), utilization (B), and oxidation (C), which were quantified with positron emission tomography. Pairwise comparisons show no difference among the groups in FA uptake, but FA utilization was greater in the obese men compared with nonobese men. Fatty acid oxidation was greater in the obese men compared with nonobese men, and it was greater in the obese women compared with nonobese women.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link