Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:436-445, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.03.010
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klem, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sechtem, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klem, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sechtem, U.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Testing for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Women

Igor Klem, MD*,*, Simon Greulich, MD{dagger}, John F. Heitner, MD{ddagger}, Han Kim, MD*, Holger Vogelsberg, MD{dagger}, Eva-Maria Kispert{dagger}, Srivani R. Ambati, MD*, Christian Bruch, MD§, Michele Parker, RN, MS*, Robert M. Judd, PhD*, Raymond J. Kim, MD, FACC*, Udo Sechtem, MD, FACC{dagger}

* Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Durham, North Carolina
{dagger} Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
{ddagger} New York Methodist Hospital, New York, New York
§ Kliniken Miltenberg-Erlenbach GmbH


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Receiver-Operator Characteristic Curves

Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis comparing the combined perfusion and delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) stress test using the interpretation algorithm to perfusion CMR alone for the detection of coronary artery disease. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined CMR stress test was significantly greater (p = 0.002). AUC = area under curve.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Patient Examples of CMR Stress Test in Women

Patient #1 is a 70-year-old, post-menopausal woman with typical angina and 3 coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors. There is no evidence of prior infarction on delayed-enhancement (DE) images; however, stress perfusion indicates defects in all 3 vascular territories. Coronary angiography demonstrated 3-vessel coronary disease. Patient #2 is a 50-year-old, post-menopausal woman without chest pain. However, she has diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and a positive family history for CAD. A reversible perfusion defect was noted, which was not confined to 1 coronary territory. Her coronary angiogram revealed no epicardial disease, thus microvascular disease may be suspected in this patient. Patient #3 is a 63-year-old woman with typical angina but no prior history of myocardial infarction. She is also post-menopausal and has 3 CAD risk factors. On DE-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), a transmural infarct is noted in the territory of the right coronary artery (RCA), with a corresponding dense perfusion defect in the same location. However, her coronary angiogram demonstrated only a 40% stenosis in the RCA. Although this was a false-positive CMR study, secondary CAD prevention therapy is certainly warranted in this woman. LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX = left circumflex coronary artery.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link