Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:500-510, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.05.002
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Haubner, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Haubner, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Radiolabeled Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic Acid Peptides to Image Angiogenesis in Swine Model of Hibernating Myocardium

Lynne L. Johnson, MD, FACC*,*, Lorraine Schofield, BS{dagger}, Tammy Donahay, BS{dagger}, Mark Bouchard, BS{dagger}, Athena Poppas, MD, FACC{dagger}, Roland Haubner, PhD{ddagger},§

* Columbia University, New York, New York
{dagger} Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
{ddagger} Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
§ Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Documentation of Hibernating Myocardium

All swine underwent unipolar voltage (UPV) mapping (top panel), myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurements with microspheres (middle panel), and transthoracic echocardiography (bottom panel) before myocardial injection of either phVEGF125 or saline. The UPV scores from the Noga map in the ameroid territory were reduced compared with those in the remote myocardium but in the viable range. MBF in cc/g/min was mildly reduced in the ameroid territory compared with that in the remote myocardium. The percent wall thickening in the ameroid territory was reduced compared with that in the remote myocardium. These findings of abnormally functioning but viable myocardium fulfill the criteria for hibernation.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Change in Blood Flow Ratios in VEGF-Injected and Control Animals

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) is expressed as ratio of MBF in the ameroid territory to remote territory. The change (± SD) from immediately before intramyocardial injection of either phVEGF165 or saline to 3 weeks after injection for both treatment and control experiments are expressed as percent. The blood flow ratio increased in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-injected animals (orange bar) and decreased in the saline-injected animals (yellow bar). LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCx = left circumflex artery.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Change in LV Function Over Time

Global and regional left ventricular (LV) function were measured using echocardiography immediately before and 3 weeks after intramyocardial injection with either phVEGF125 (yellow bars) or saline (orange bars). Mean value for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased slightly but with a large standard deviation (error bar) while mean value for LVEF fell in the saline-treated animals but also with a large standard deviation. Wall thickening (WT) in the ameroid territory increased slightly in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-treated animals and fell in the saline-treated animals.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Immunohistology Documenting Angiogenesis in VEGF-Injected Animals

Values from quantitative immunohistology in the ameroid territory for the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-injected animals (yellow bars) and saline-injected animals (orange bars) are shown in the upper panel. The VEGF-injected experiments showed less fibrosis and greater capillary sprouting by lectin staining than the saline-injected control experiments. The bottom images show representative examples of tissue staining. Panel A shows a myocardial section stained for lectin from the injection territory from 1 VEGF experiment, and panel B shows 1 saline-injected animal. Brown staining of sprouting capillaries is seen in panel A and is absent in panel B. Panel C shows green fluorescence identifying integrin expression in capillary sprouts from the injection site of 1 VEGF-injected animal that showed in-vivo uptake of [123I]Gluco-RGD. FITC = fluorescein.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Noga Maps and Unipolar Voltage Score in VEGF-Injected and Control Animals

Images shown on the left are unipolar voltage maps at the time of injection with the injection sites marked for 1 saline-injected animal and 1 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-injected animal. The 2 Noga maps on the right were acquired during the final study on the same 2 animals. The color bar in the right upper corner of each image corresponds to unipolar voltage values from 6 mV (orange) to 15 mV (pink). The saline-injected region shows a fall in unipolar voltage score, while the VEGF-injected region shows an increase in unipolar voltage score.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 SPECT Scans for RGD-Based Targeting of Neoangiogenesis

On the left are shown reconstructed short-axis (SA), vertical (VLA), and horizontal long-axis (HLA) single-photon computed tomography (SPECT) slices from the thallium scans (top rows) and I-123 scans (bottom rows) from 1 representative animal treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and 1 animal treated with saline. The VEGF-injected animal shows a mild anterolateral thallium defect and focal uptake of [123I]Gluco-RGD into the anterolateral wall. The colocalization of the thallium defect and focal hotspot is better displayed on the polar maps. The saline-injected animal shows a mild-to-moderate anterolateral and apical defect without focal uptake of of [123I]Gluco-RGD in the heart. RGD = arginine-glycine-aspartic acid.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7 [123I]Gluco-RGD Uptake Versus Angiogenesis

Graph shows percent injected dose (ID) per gram of tissue for [123I]Gluco-RGD plotted versus lectin staining as percent area for vascular endothelial growth factor-injected animals (yellow triangles) and saline injected (orange squares). Although the relationship is significant, there is not a perfect separation between the 2 groups. One saline-injected animal showed no focal hotspot in the myocardium but showed a higher level of background activity for I-123. One of the vascular endothelial growth factor-injected experiments had low uptake of [123I]Gluco-RGD, which corresponded to lower levels of angiogenesis by lectin staining. RGD = arginine-glycine-aspartic acid.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link