Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:582-591, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.05.012
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View PowerPoint Slide Set
Right arrow View Related Journal Scan on Cardiosource
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Verma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, S. D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry Following Myocardial Infarction

The VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion) Echocardiographic Study

Anil Verma, MD*, Alessandra Meris, MD*, Hicham Skali, MD*, Jalal K. Ghali, MD{dagger}, J. Malcolm O. Arnold, MD{ddagger}, Mikhail Bourgoun, MD*, Eric J. Velazquez, MD§, John J.V. McMurray, MD||, Lars Kober, MD, Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD*, Robert M. Califf, MD#, Scott D. Solomon, MD*,*

* Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
{ddagger} University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
§ Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
|| Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland
Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
# Duke Translational Medicine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Adjusted Hazard Ratios (95% Confidence Intervals) for Adverse Outcomes

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the independent prognostic value of left ventricular mass index (LVMi), LV mass/end-diastolic volume (EDV), and relative wall thickness (RWT). The models were adjusted for age (years), primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, atrial fibrillation complicating myocardial infarction (MI), history of diabetes, history of hypertension, prior MI, Killip class, history of congestive heart failure (HF), new left bundle branch block, history of angina, LV ejection fraction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Each 10 g/m2 increase in LVMi (A), 0.1-U (10%) increase in LV mass to end-diastolic volume ratio (B), and 0.1-U (10%) increase in RWT (C) were independently associated with increased risk for death, cardiovascular (CV) death, and death or heart failure hospitalization (each p < 0.001). Echocardiographically determined LV mass and RWT are significant independent predictors of increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in high-risk post-MI patients warranting their routine assessment.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier Curves Stratified by LV Geometric Patterns

Kaplan-Meier estimates for clinical outcomes for all-cause mortality (A) and the CV composite end point (CV death, recurrent MI, heart failure, stroke, and resuscitated sudden death) (B) were determined for LV geometric patterns and were presented as event curves. There was a wide spectrum of risk across the categories of LV geometrical patterns, with early divergence of the Kaplan-Meier curves for mortality and composite end point, particularly between patients with normal geometry and those with concentric hypertrophy. Concentric hypertrophy carried the greatest CV risk, followed by eccentric hypertrophy, and then concentric remodeling, underscoring the importance of increased LV mass and RWT as important risk predictors following high risk MI. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Crude Incidence Rates per 100-Person Years

Crude incidence rates per 100 person-years were calculated for the defined time-dependent clinical CV outcomes and depicted as bar graph, for LV geometrical patterns. Concentric hypertrophy carried the greatest incidence rate for adverse CV outcomes including CV mortality, recurrent MI, heart failure, stroke and sudden cardiac death. Even concentric remodeling was associated with poor prognosis compared with patients with normal LV geometry. Concentric hypertrophy had higher incidence rates for CV mortality and heart failure development and also recurrent MI, stroke, and sudden cardiac death. Routine echocardiographic assessment of LV mass and its geometry following a high-risk MI is important. SD = sudden death; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link