Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:652-662, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.07.011
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedrich, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Friedrich, M. G.

Tissue Characterization of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Myocarditis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Matthias G. Friedrich, MD, FESC*

Departments of Cardiac Sciences and Radiology, Stephenson Cardiovascular MR Centre at the Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Strengths of Currently Used Cardiac Imaging Tools

Diagnostic power of cardiac imaging techniques at different levels of pathophysiology. CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; CT = computed tomography; Echo = echocardiography; Nuclear = nuclear cardiology techniques.

 

Figure 2
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video

Figure 2 CMR of Acute, Nontransmural Infarction

(Upper panels) Diastolic (left) and systolic (right) frames in a short-axis view. (Lower panels) T2-weighted (left) and post-contrast T1-weighted (late enhancement) (right) images showing infarction-related transmural edema but only subendocardial necrosis (see Online Video 1).

 

Figure 3
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video

Figure 3 CMR of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy With Chronic, Transmural Inferior Infarction

(Upper panels) Diastolic (left) and systolic (right) frames in a short axis view with akinesis of the inferoseptal and inferior segments. (Lower panels) T2-weighted (left) and post-contrast T1-weighted (late enhancement) (right) images showing no edema, but transmural fibrosis (arrows) within the akinetic region (see Online Video 2).

 

Figure 4
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video

Figure 4 CMR in a Patient With Acute Myocarditis

(Upper panels) Diastolic (left) and systolic (right) frames of a cine study showing pericardial effusion (bright signal) and largely preserved systolic function. (Lower panels) T2-weighted (left) and post-contrast T1-weighted (late enhancement) (right) images showing lateral edema (arrows) and focal fibrosis typical for the nonischemic injury pattern of myocarditis (arrows) (see Online Video 3).

 

Figure 5
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video

Figure 5 CMR of Acute, Transmural Infarction

(Upper panels) Diastolic (left) and systolic (right) frames in a short-axis view. (Lower panels) T2-weighted (left) and post-contrast T1-weighted (late enhancement) (right) images showing infarct-related transmural edema with transmural necrosis of the same size (see Online Video 4).

 

Figure 6
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video

Figure 6 CMR of Acute, Transmural Infarction With No-Reflow in a Patient With Reperfused Lateral Infarction, Who Presented Late After Onset of Symptoms

(Upper panels) Diastolic (left) and systolic (right) frames in a short-axis view showing preserved wall thickness of the lateral wall but regional akinesis of the anterolateral and inferolateral segments. (Lower panels) T2-weighted (left) and post-contrast T1-weighted (late enhancement) (right) images showing infarction-related transmural edema and matching necrosis in the dysfunctional segments. Both, T2-weighted and late enhancement images show a core with reduced signal intensity reflecting no-reflow (arrowheads) (see Online Video 5).

 

Figure 7
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video

Figure 7 CMR of a Patient With Acute Myocarditis

(Left panel) Diastolic (upper) and systolic (lower) frames of a cine study showing hyperdynamic systolic function. (Middle panel) Non-breath-hold T1-weighted images acquired before (upper) and over the first minutes after gadolinium indicating significant myocardial gadolinium uptake. The uptake ratio (early enhancement) was increased. (Right upper panel) T2-weighted image with high signal intensity of the anterior wall. (Right lower panel) Post-contrast T1-weighted (late enhancement) image showing possible diffuse necrosis but lack of regional injury (see Online Video 6).

 

Figure 8
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video

Figure 8 CMR of a Patient With Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Scarring

(Left panel) Diastolic (upper) and systolic (lower) frames of a cine study showing grossly systolic function with mild septal hypokinesis. (Middle panel) Non-breath-hold T1-weighted images acquired before (upper) and over the first minutes after gadolinium indicating significant myocardial gadolinium uptake. The uptake ratio (early enhancement) was increased. (Right upper panel) T2-weighted image with high signal intensity of the septum (arrow). (Right lower panel) Post-contrast T1-weighted (late enhancement) image showing a focal scar in the lateral wall but no necrosis in the septal region (see Online Video 7).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (183K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9 CMR of a Patient With Remote Myocarditis

This CMR image of a patient with remote myocarditis shows chronic multifocal, partially subendocardial scarring in a T1-weighted (late enhancement) image.

 

Figure 10
View larger version:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 


Click on image to view video


Click on image to view video

Figure 10 CMR of an Elderly Patient With Acute Anterior Infarction and Invasive Exclusion of Relevant Coronary Artery Stenosis

(A) The CMR images taken at admission of an elderly woman who presented with acute anterior infarction and invasive exclusion of relevant coronary artery stenosis. (Left panel) Diastolic (upper) and systolic (lower) frames of a breath-hold cine study, showing typical extensive mid-ventricular and apical dyskinesia ("ballooning"). (Right upper panel) T2-weighted image showing diffuse intraventricular high signal intensity due to slow flowing blood as well as an increased signal intensity of the mid-ventricular and apical myocardium, presumably reflecting myocardial edema. (Right lower panel) Late gadolinium enhancement study showing no subendocardial high signal intensity but some diffuse late enhancement of the dysfunctional segments. The final diagnosis in this patient was acute stress-induced cardiomyopathy (see Online Video 8). (B) Follow-up study of the same patient after 4 weeks. (Left panel) Diastolic (upper) and systolic (lower) frames of a breath-hold cine study, showing normalization of systolic function. (Right upper panel) T2-weighted image showing homogeneous signal intensity. (Right lower panel) Late gadolinium enhancement study showing persisting diffuse late enhancement of the dysfunctional segments (see Online Video 9).

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link