Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:1285-1291, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.07.009
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Razavi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Razavi, R.

Noninvasive Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Flow and Resistance by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Congenital Heart Diseases With Unrestricted Left-to-Right Shunt

Aaron Bell, MB, ChB*,{dagger},*, Philipp Beerbaum, MD*,{dagger}, Gerald Greil, MD*,{dagger}, Sanjeet Hegde, MBBS*, André Michael Toschke, MD, MSc, MPH{ddagger}, Tobias Schaeffter, PhD*, Reza Razavi, MD*,{dagger}

* Kings College London, BHF Centre of Excellence, Division of Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
{ddagger} Division of Health and Social Care Research, Kings College, London, United Kingdom


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Relationship Between Resistance and Flow Parameters

Univariate regression models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are shown demonstrating the inverse exponential relationship between pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and (A) pulmonary artery flow (Qp) and (B) left-to-right shunt. Given the patient numbers, the CIs are quite wide; however, all patients with an elevated Qp or shunt in excess of 2.5/1 have a PVR ≤3.5 Woods Units (WU)/m2. Of note, only a small number of patients had an elevated PVR.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Relationship Between Resistance and Pressure Parameters

Univariate regression models with 95% CIs are shown demonstrating the direct exponential relationship between PVR and (A) mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) (mm Hg) and (B) the mean transpulmonary gradient. The CIs for MPAP are very wide, and the MPAP can be in excess of 40 mm Hg with the PVR remaining within an acceptable range. This illustrates that pulmonary artery pressure measurements alone provide an incomplete picture, and clinical decisions should not be based on pressure parameters alone. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Cutoff Values for PVR

Scatterplot and corresponding receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves for shunt magnitude (left-to-right shunt [Qp/Qs]) (A, B) and Qp (C, D). All patients with a PVR ≥3.5 WU/m2 had a Qp/Qs <2.5/1 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 or a Qp <6.05 l/min/m2, area under the ROC curve of 0.90. With future validation these values could be applied clinically, where those with a Qp of ≥6.05 l/min/m2 or a shunt ≥2.5/1 measured by phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance could proceed to surgery without invasive assessment. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link