Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:1301-1309, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.09.006
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venkataraman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Venkataraman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

A Study of the Effects of Ranolazine Using Automated Quantitative Analysis of Serial Myocardial Perfusion Images

Rajesh Venkataraman, MD, MPH*,*, Luiz Belardinelli, MD{dagger}, Brent Blackburn, PhD{dagger}, Jaekyeong Heo, MD*, Ami E. Iskandrian, MD*

* Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
{dagger} Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Change in Exercise Treadmill Times

Change in exercise treadmill times (in seconds) before and after ranolazine therapy. The mean and SD values before and after treatment are shown.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Change in Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Variables

Changes in summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference score (SDS) (top rows) and changes in total, fixed (scar), and reversible (ischemia) defect size by polar maps (bottom rows). The mean ± SD values are shown in each panel.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Representative Example of Improvement in Myocardial Perfusion by Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

A representative example of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging before and after ranolazine treatment showing quantitative improvement in myocardial perfusion in polar maps. Radionuclide injection was performed at a peak heart rate of 142 beats/min in both tests. The raw images during stress before ranolazine (A, top panel), stress after ranolazine (B, middle panel), and at rest (C, bottom panel) are shown. Each panel shows serial slices from the apex to the base in the short-axis projection and 1 slice at mid left ventricular level in the vertical and horizontal long-axis projections. The perfusion defect size decreased from 25% to 11% of left ventricular myocardium (14% absolute reduction) by polar maps, and the improvement is also visible by visual analysis of the images.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link