Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:825-831, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.011
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Quantification of Myocardial Area at Risk With T2-Weighted CMR

Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced CMR and Coronary Angiography

Jeremy Wright, MBBS*,{ddagger}, Tom Adriaenssens, MD{dagger}, Steven Dymarkowski, MD, PhD*, Walter Desmet, MD, PhD{dagger}, Jan Bogaert, MD, PhD*,*

* Department of Radiology, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
{ddagger} Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia


Figure 1
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Hemorrhagic Myocardial Infarction in a 69-Year-Old Man

Coronary angiography before (A) and after (B) percutaneous coronary intervention, T2-weighted (T2W) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (C). Left anterior oblique cranial view shows a proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion with thrombotic appearance (A). Presence of 60% stenosis on mid left circumflex coronary artery and 40% stenosis on the fourth inferolateral branch. Successful reperfusion of LAD (B). The T2W CMR shows area of increased signal intensity in anteroseptal left ventricular wall with hypointense core consistent with post-reperfusion intramyocardial hemorrhage (C). The BARI (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation) risk score is 43.5%, T2W area at risk 48.7%.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 T2-Weighted and Contrast-Enhanced CMR Images

The T2W CMR (A) and contrast-enhanced CMR (B) in a 77-year-old male patient with an extensive anteroseptal acute myocardial infarction. On short-axis T2W CMR the area at risk is visible as a hyperintense (i.e., bright gray) area and is slightly larger than the infarct area as visible on contrast-enhanced CMR (i.e., 29.7% vs. 26.2%, respectively). The BARI risk score is 21.7%, and the infarct endocardial surface length is 24%. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Myocardium at Risk and Infarct Size

The percentage of myocardium at risk during acute myocardial infarction was consistently greater than the irreversibly injured myocardium. The volume of myocardium at risk was measured with T2W CMR, and irreversibly injured myocardium was measured with contrast-enhanced CMR. The dashed line indicates the line of identity. AAR = area at risk; LV = left ventricular; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 T2W AAR and Infarct ESL

The AAR measured with T2W CMR correlates strongly with the infarct endocardial surface length (ESL) (r = 0.77). The solid line is the regression line, whereas the dotted line is the line of identity. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Bland-Altman Plots of T2W AAR With Infarct ESL and BARI Risk Score With Infarct ESL

Both T2W AAR (7.8 ± 10.0%) (A) and BARI risk score (7.3 ± 11.2%) (B) show a positive bias compared with infarct ESL. The solid lines are the mean difference, whereas the dashed lines represent ± 2 SD from the mean. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 3.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link