Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:940-946, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.015
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Go to related CVN interview Interview
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bischoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hausleiter, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bischoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hausleiter, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Impact of a Reduced Tube Voltage on CT Angiography and Radiation Dose

Results of the PROTECTION I Study

Bernhard Bischoff, MD*, Franziska Hein, MD*, Tanja Meyer, MD*, Martin Hadamitzky, MD*, Stefan Martinoff, MD{dagger}, Albert Schömig, MD*, Jörg Hausleiter, MD*,*

* Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik an der TU München, Munich, Germany
{dagger} Institut für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik an der TU München, Munich, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Measuring of Image Quality Data in a Proximal Left Main Coronary Artery

Region of interest (circle) in the left main coronary artery example illustrating determination of signal intensity (425 HU) and image noise (28 HU), as performed in every patient in the left main and proximal right coronary artery.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Diagnostic Image Quality Score Depending on Tube Voltage

Boxplots indicating a comparable image quality score in the 120-kV and 100-kV study groups (p = 0.22). Diagnostic image quality was assessed by an experienced coronary computed tomography angiography investigator with a 4-point score (1: nondiagnostic to 4: excellent image quality).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Representative Coronary Computed Tomography Angiograms Demonstrating the Image Quality in Both Study Groups

Curved-planar maximum intensity projections of the right coronary artery (A, D), the left descending artery (B, E), and the left circumflex artery (C, F) demonstrating the image quality of the 100-kV (A to C) and the 120-kV protocol (D to F) at identical window levels and hence illustrating the higher attenuation in the 100-kV scan protocol.

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link