Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:959-968, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.04.011
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahmarian, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Olmsted, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mahmarian, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Olmsted, A. W.

Regadenoson Induces Comparable Left Ventricular Perfusion Defects as Adenosine

A Quantitative Analysis From the ADVANCE MPI 2 Trial

John J. Mahmarian, MD*,*, Manuel D. Cerqueira, MD{dagger}, Ami E. Iskandrian, MD{ddagger}, Timothy M. Bateman, MD§, Gregory S. Thomas, MD, MPH||, Robert C. Hendel, MD, Lemuel A. Moye, MD, PhD#, Ann W. Olmsted, PhD**

* Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
{dagger} Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
{ddagger} University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
§ Mid America Heart Institute of Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
|| University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
Midwest Heart Specialists, Winfield, Illinois
# University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
** CV Therapeutics, Inc., Palo Alto, California


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Linear Regression Analysis of Serial Adenosine–Regadenoson SPECT Results

Excellent agreement is seen between the adenosine and regadenoson induced total (A) and ischemic (B) perfusion defect size (PDS) results. SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Absolute Differences in Serial Imaging Results

Shown are differences ({Delta}) in total perfusion defect size (PDS) (A) and ischemic PDS (B) from the initial adenosine study (Ad1) to the regadenoson study. The differences reflect a typical Gaussian distribution. – = decrease in PDS with regadenoson; + = increase in PDS with regadenoson; NL = normal.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Scintigraphic Results in Patients With a Visually Abnormal Baseline Perfusion study

Serial mean total and ischemic left ventricular (LV) perfusion defect size (PDS) results are shown for the entire cohort and the 2 randomized groups. p = not significant, all comparisons study 1 to study 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Representative Patient Example

The reoriented adenosine, regadenoson, and rest images are displayed in the short, vertical long, and horizontal long axes. The polar maps for adenosine and regadenoson both show a total perfusion defect size (PDS) of 40% with 27% ischemia (adenosine) and 25% ischemia (regadenoson) (green).

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link