Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2010; 3:176-187, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.09.024
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Xie, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Porter, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Xie, F.

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Contrast Ultrasound

Thomas R. Porter, MD*, Feng Xie, MD

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 An Example of the Excellent Background Subtraction

The images are achieved with low–mechanical index pulse sequence schemes designed to assess myocardial perfusion. In this apical 4-chamber view, note that there are virtually no signals from the myocardium before contrast administration (A), but excellent left ventricular cavity opacification (B) and eventual myocardial contrast (C) after venous infusion of ultrasound contrast. The attenuation in the basal segments is most likely due to a high initial concentration of microbubbles in the left ventricular cavity.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 An Example of Normal Myocardial Replenishment (Apical 3-Chamber)

With real-time perfusion image, the myocardial replenishment is after a high–mechanical index (MI) impulse. Note under resting conditions (A) that normal replenishment occurs within 4 s of the high MI impulse, whereas during stress (vasodilator, dobutamine, exercise), replenishment normally occurs within 2 s (B).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 An Example of a Subendocardial Perfusion Defect

The defect is evident in the anteroseptal and apical segments of the left ventricle during the replenishment phase of contrast after a high–mechanical index impulse during adenosine stress imaging. Note that because the defect was confined to the subendocardium (black arrows), there was no evident defect noted on the lower-resolution radionuclide single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image despite the presence of significant coronary artery disease at angiography (Angio) (red arrows). Reprinted, with permission, from Xie et al. (33).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Proposed Protocols for Dipyridamole or Adenosine Stress Infusions

The images shown are not intended for analysis of perfusion, but to serve as reminders when to examine myocardial contrast echocardiography.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 An Example of a Subendocardial Wall-Thickening Abnormality

The abnormality is delineated by real-time perfusion imaging during the replenishment phase of contrast (During MCR) after the high–mechanical index (MI) impulse. If only transmural wall thickening were examined in this patient (Pre-MCR after High MI Impulse images), the wall thickening would have appeared normal. Reprinted, with permission, from Xie et al. (55). MCR = myocardial contrast replenishment.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 An Example of an Inferior Wall Perfusion Defect

The defect was confined to the subendocardium after treadmill exercise stress, where a subendocardial wall-thickening abnormality was also observed (blue arrows). Note also the end-systolic shape change that accompanies the perfusion defect. The open arrows indicate an area of rib shadowing that prevented delineation of perfusion in the basal to mid-anterior segments. A foreshortened apical 2-chamber view can be used to delineate perfusion in these segments.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7 Proposed Protocols for Dobutamine or Treadmill/Bicycle Exercise Stress

The images shown are not intended for analysis of perfusion, but to serve as reminders when to examine myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8 An Example of a Patient With Left Bundle Branch Block

An example of a patient with left bundle branch block who exhibited normal perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography but abnormal perfusion in the septum during radionuclide single-photon emission computed tomography despite no significant coronary artery disease. See text for details. Reprinted, with permission, from Hayat et al. (34).

 




Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link