Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Figure 5 Comparisons Between RT3DE and CMR Measurements of LV Volumes and EF

These plots show the results of linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses between RT3DE-derived LV volumes (end-diastolic volume [EDV] and end-systolic volume [ESV]) and ejection fraction (EF) against CMR reference values obtained in 92 study patients: r values and difference from CMR values averaged over patients (bias) ± standard deviation (95% limits of agreement [LOA]). Despite the high correlations that were similar to previously published single-center studies, RT3DE-derived volumes showed large negative biases in the multicenter setting. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.





Right arrow Return to article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link