Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 7


Figure 7 Intertechnique Comparisons for CMR Measurements of LV Volumes

Results of linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses of agreement between LV volumes measured in 19 patients using volumetric analysis of interpolated 3D CMR datasets (QLAB Advanced software) and the conventional method of disk approximation (ViewForum software, Philips). The high levels of agreement evidenced by these results ruled out analysis-related differences between RT3DE and CMR measurements as a significant source of error. LOA = limits of agreement; other abbreviations as in Figures 1, 2, and 5.





Right arrow Return to article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link