Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2008; 1:498-499, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.04.006
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischell, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fischell, T. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Editorial comment

Plaque Prolapse After Stenting in Myocardial Infarction: Bad Plaque—Bad Omen?*

Tim A. Fischell, MD, FACC*

Michigan State University, Kalamazoo, Michigan.

Key Words: intravascular ultrasound • plaque prolapse • vulnerable plaque • acute myocardial infarction


In this issue of iJACC (JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging), Hong et al. (1) have made a number of interesting observations regarding the relatively high incidence (27%) and poorer prognosis associated with the intravascular ultrasound finding of tissue prolapse through stent struts in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction (MI). Tissue prolapse through the stent struts was seen more often in patients with ST-segment elevation MI. Prolapse of material through the stent struts was also predicted by positive remodeling, ruptured plaques, and longer stented segments. There was a trend toward a higher frequency of plaque prolapse with open-cell compared to closed-cell stent designs (1).

These main findings fit well with our thinking about the type(s) of plaque material and the results that we might expect when placing a lattice-like metallic structure in plaques that have ruptured and have caused myocardial necrosis (2–5). "Vulnerable plaques" that rupture and cause MI are more typically bulky, lipid-laden, and associated with positive remodeling (3). As these types of plaques rupture, a thrombus may form, break up, and re-form, leaving layers of an organized thrombus that may also behave as "soft" tissue.

One of the potential limitations of the current study is that it may be difficult, using intravascular ultrasound, to distinguish between soft lipid-laden plaque and a "rubbery," organized thrombus. It is quite possible that an organized thrombus, and not plaque, could represent a significant component of the prolapsed tissue that was observed to protrude through the stent struts.

The finding that plaque prolapse was associated with a greater degree of myocardial necrosis than those cases without tissue prolapse would be consistent with increased distal plaque embolization, greater thrombus formation, transient vessel occlusion, and/or greater thrombus embolization. In any event, it is clear that soft material that protrudes through stent struts is associated with a greater extent of myocardial injury.

Although the study did not identify this tissue prolapse as a statistically significant predictor of subacute stent thrombosis (0 to 30 days), this "negative finding" must be interpreted cautiously. The study was not adequately powered to discern such a difference, and there was a worrisome trend toward greater subacute thromboses in the plaque prolapse group (2.4% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.308).

One of the other interesting findings was the association between stent design and the incidence of plaque or tissue prolapse (1). In this case, the Taxus stent (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts), which is open-cell and similar in design to the old Tetra stent from Guidant (Santa Clara, California), had plaque prolapse observed in 39% of cases versus 25% of cases with the closed-cell CYPHER stent (Cordis Corp., Miami Lakes, Florida). These findings are consistent with other studies (2,6), including one of our studies comparing the open-cell Duet stent (Guidant) with the closed cell NIR stent (Boston Scientific) (Fig. 1) (6). These observations suggest that better plaque and vessel wall coverage could potentially be advantageous in the setting of stenting for acute MI, with either drug-eluting or bare-metal stents.


Figure 1
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Plaque Prolapse Associated With Open-Cell Stent Design

Panel A shows a markedly "scalloped" luminal contour in the right coronary artery after deployment of an open-cell stent (brown arrow). This is confirmed to be due to substantial plaque prolapse and invagination of plaque in the gaps between struts, by intravascular ultrasound (B, brown arrow). There is good exclusion of plaque at the site where the circumferential stent elements are present (C, yellow arrow).

 
The current study by Hong et al. (1) has helped us to elucidate the incidence as well as the clinical and morphological predictors of plaque/tissue prolapse after stenting for acute MI. Although the study was not adequately powered to ascertain with certainty the clinical consequences of plaque prolapse, the study suggests that this finding is unfavorable, with regard to both infarct size, and possibly to the risk of subacute stent thrombosis. Additional longitudinal studies and longer-term follow-up of the cohort from the current study would be useful to help us better understand stent selection and the impact of plaque prolapse after stenting for acute MI.


    Footnotes
 
Dr. Fischell is a consultant for Cordis Corp. and Abbott, and holds license patents with Cordis Corp. and Abbott.

* Editorials published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging or the American College of Cardiology. Back

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Tim A. Fischell, Director, Cardiovascular Research, Borgess Heart Institute, Professor of Medicine, Michigan State University, 1521 Gull Road, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49048. (Email: tafisc{at}gmail.com).


    REFERENCES
 Top
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Plaque prolapse after stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound analysis J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008;1:489-497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Foutamatsu H, Sabate M, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Characterization of plaque prolapse after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients: a three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound outcome study J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1139-1145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kotani J, Mintz GS, Castagna MT, et al. Intravascular ultrasound analysis of infarct-related and non-infarct-related arteries in patients who presented with an acute myocardial infarction Circulation 2003;107:2889-2893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, et al. Comparison of coronary plaque rupture between stable angina and acute myocardial infarction: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study in 235 patients Circulation 2004;110:928-933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, et al. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1262-1275.[Free Full Text]
  6. Hehrlein C, DeVries JJ, Haller SD, Kloostra A, Foster MT, Fischell TA. Acute performance characteristics of DUET versus NIR stent and stent delivery systems Am J Cardiol 1999;84(Suppl (6A)):110P-111P.[CrossRef]

Related Article

Plaque Prolapse After Stent Implantation in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis
Young Joon Hong, Myung Ho Jeong, Youngkeun Ahn, Doo Sun Sim, Jong Won Chung, Jung Sun Cho, Nam Sik Yoon, Hyun Ju Yoon, Jae Youn Moon, Kye Hun Kim, Hyung Wook Park, Ju Han Kim, Jeong Gwan Cho, Jong Chun Park, and Jung Chaee Kang
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2008 1: 489-497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischell, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fischell, T. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link