Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

     top nav image

     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 9


Figure 9 Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Techniques for Functional Recovery

Comparison of sensitivities and specificities (A) and predictive values (B) with 95% confidence intervals for the recovery of regional wall function. Comparison of sensitivities and specificities (C) and predictive values (D) of the various techniques with 95% confidence intervals for prediction of the recovery of global left ventricular function. Reprinted, with permission, from Schinkel et al. (86). FDG = 18F fluorodeoxyglucose; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; pts = number of patients; st = number of studies; Tc-99m = Technetium-99m–labeled agents; T1-201 = thallium 201; other abbreviations as in Figures 2, 3, and 5.





Right arrow Return to article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link