Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 3


Figure 3 Relationship Between True Orifice Area and VC Area

Vena contracta (VC) area assessed from an imaging window either parallel (apical equivalent) or perpendicular (parasternal equivalent) to the long axis of flow in the in vitro model. For individual orifice shapes, the VC area measurements were different (p < 0.05) for only the smallest circle orifice. This statistical difference is likely related to the small variance of those small area measurements. Combining all orifice shapes, VC area assessed from the image window perpendicular to flow was more accurate and statistically different (p < 0.05) from the VC area assessed from the parallel imaging window. Orange bar indicates the actual area for each orifice.





Right arrow Return to article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link