Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 6


Figure 6 MR Severity Affects 2D and 3D Method Accuracy

Upper panels depict the relation of 2D-VC diameter to EROA (A) and 3D-VC area to EROA (B) for MR severity grades 1 and 2. Lower panels depict the same relation in patients with MR severity grades 3 or 4. Dotted orange lines as in Figure 4. The relation between EROA and 2D-VC area was best for mild and mild-to-moderate MR (A). In contrast, the relation between EROA and 3D-VC area was best for moderate-to-severe and severe MR (D). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 5.





Right arrow Return to article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link