Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2009; 2:1187-1194, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.06.008
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nijveldt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nijveldt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Early Electrocardiographic Findings and MR Imaging-Verified Microvascular Injury and Myocardial Infarct Size

Robin Nijveldt, MD, PhD*,{dagger},*, Pieter A. van der Vleuten, MD{ddagger}, Alexander Hirsch, MD{dagger},§, Aernout M. Beek, MD*, René A. Tio, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Jan G.P. Tijssen, PhD§, Jan J. Piek, MD, PhD§, Albert C. van Rossum, MD, PhD*,{dagger}, Felix Zijlstra, MD, PhD{ddagger}

* Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
{dagger} Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
§ Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Objectives: This study investigated early electrocardiographic findings in relation to left ventricular (LV) function, extent and size of infarction, and microvascular injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most used and simplest clinical method to evaluate the risk for patients immediately after reperfusion therapy for acute MI. ST-segment resolution and residual ST-segment elevation have been used for prognosis in acute MI, whereas Q waves are related to outcome in chronic MI. We hypothesized that the combination of these electrocardiographic measures early after primary PCI would enhance risk stratification.

Methods: We prospectively included 180 patients with a first acute ST-segment elevation MI to assess ST-segment resolution, residual ST-segment elevation, and number of Q waves using the 12-lead ECG acquired on admission and 1 h after successful PCI. The ECG findings were related to LV function, infarction size and transmurality, and microvascular injury as assessed with cine and gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance 4 ± 2 days after reperfusion therapy.

Results: Residual ST-segment elevation (β = –2.00, p = 0.004) and the number of Q waves (β = –1.66, p = 0.005) were independent ECG predictors of LV ejection fraction. Although the number of Q waves was the only independent predictor of infarct size (β = 2.01, p < 0.001) and transmural extent of infarction (β = 0.60, p < 0.001), residual ST-segment elevation was the only independent predictor of microvascular injury (odds ratio: 19.1, 95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 154, p = 0.005) in multivariable analyses. The ST-segment resolution was neither associated with LV function, infarct size, or transmurality indexes, nor with microvascular injury in multivariable analysis.

Conclusions: In patients after successful coronary intervention for acute MI, residual ST-segment elevation and the number of Q waves on the post-procedural ECG offer valuable complementary information on prediction of myocardial function and necrosis and its microvascular status.

Key Words: electrocardiography • cardiac magnetic resonance • myocardial infarction • left ventricular function

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance
  ECG = electrocardiogram/electrocardiography
  LGE = late gadolinium enhancement
  LV = left ventricular
  LVEDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume
  LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
  LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume
  MI = myocardial infarction
  MBG = myocardial blush grading
  MVO = microvascular obstruction
  OR = odds ratio
  PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention
  TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction


The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most used and simplest clinical method to evaluate the risk for patients immediately after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI). In the early 1970s, experimental and in vivo studies established the use of ST-segment elevation as a reflection of myocardial injury (1,2), and later, ECG has proven to offer valuable prognostic information for patients treated with thrombolytic therapy or primary angioplasty (3,4). Patients with acute MI are stratified to ST-segment elevation or non–ST-segment elevation MI (5), and incomplete normalization of the ST-segment after reperfusion is associated with more extensive myocardial damage, microvascular injury, and a higher mortality rate (3,4,6–8). Similarly, patients with old infarction are divided into Q-wave and non–Q-wave MI (5), in which the presence of Q waves is related to larger infarcts and an increased mortality (9–11).

In current clinical practice, an ECG is routinely obtained shortly after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute MI to evaluate the success of reperfusion and for initial risk stratification. Aside from ST-segment resolution and residual ST-segment elevation, the ECG offers information on early Q waves. Limited data are available on the additional value of Q-wave assessment compared with ST-segment resolution or residual ST-segment elevation early after reperfusion with respect to myocardial function and necrosis.

The purpose of this study was therefore to prospectively explore the significance of ECG findings early after primary PCI in relation to left ventricular (LV) function, extent and size of infarction, and microvascular injury as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Patient population.   We screened consecutive patients presenting with a first ST-segment elevation acute MI according to standard ECG and enzymatic criteria (5). All patients had undergone primary PCI with stent implantation within 12 h of symptom onset. Exclusion criteria were: unsuccessful PCI, hemodynamic instability, elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band <10 times the local upper limit of normal, and (relative) contraindications for CMR. One-hundred eighty patients in 4 Dutch angioplasty centers were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, abciximab, clopidogrel, statins, beta-blocking agents, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines (12). All patients gave informed consent to the study protocol, which was approved by the local ethics committees of the participating centers.

ECG.   The ST-segment resolution was evaluated on a 12-lead surface ECG acquired on admission and 1 h after PCI. The total degree of ST-segment resolution was determined 60 ms after the J point, and categorized as complete (≥70%), partial (30% to <70%), or no (<30%) ST-segment resolution (3). Residual ST-segment elevation and the presence of Q waves were assessed on the post-procedural ECG. Residual ST-segment elevation was stratified as 0.0 to 0.2, 0.3 to 0.5, 0.6 to 1.0, and >1.0 mV of persisting ST-segment elevation. The presence of a Q wave was defined as an initial negative deflection of the QRS complex of >30 ms in duration and >0.1 mV, if it was preceded by elevation of the ST-segment of more than 0.1 mV in the same lead on the ECG at diagnosis, and with exclusion of aVR (13). The number of Q waves was categorized as 0 to 2, 3, 4, and ≥5.

CMR.   The CMR examination was performed on a 1.5-T clinical magnetic resonance scanner (Symphony/Sonata/Avanto, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a phased-array cardiac receiver coil, at 4 ± 2 days after reperfusion. The ECG-gated images were acquired during repeated breath-holds. Contiguous short-axis slices were acquired using a segmented steady-state free-precession pulse sequence in multiple short axis views every 10 mm covering the entire LV from base to apex, to examine global and segmental LV function. Typical in-plane resolution was 1.6 x 1.9 mm2, with slice thickness 5.0 to 6.0 mm (repetition time/echo time 3.2/1.6 ms, flip angle 60°, matrix 256 x 156, temporal resolution 35 to 50 ms). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed 10 to 15 min after administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (Dotarem, Guerbet, Roissy, France; 0.2 mmol/kg) with a 2-dimensional segmented inversion recovery gradient-echo pulse sequence, to examine infarct size and segmental transmural extent of infarction. Typical in-plane resolution was 1.4 x 1.7 mm2, with slice thickness 5.0 to 6.0 mm (repetition time/echo time = 9.6/4.4 ms, flip angle 25°, triggering to every other heartbeat). The inversion time was set to null the signal of viable myocardium.

The CMR data were analyzed using a dedicated software package (Mass 2008beta, Medis, Leiden, the Netherlands). On short axis cine slices, the endocardial and epicardial borders were outlined manually in end-diastolic and -systolic images. From these, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and mass were calculated. The assessment of LGE images for infarct size and microvascular injury (microvascular obstruction [MVO]) was done as previously described (7). Total infarct size was expressed as percentage of LV mass. MVO was defined as any region of hypoenhancement within the hyperenhanced area (Fig. 1) and was included in the calculation of total infarct size. The standard 17-segment model was used for segmental analysis of myocardial function and transmural extent of infarction (14), excluding segment 17 (apex), because segmental evaluation in the short-axis orientation is not considered reliable because of the partial volume effect and longitudinal shortening of the heart. Segmental wall thickening was calculated by subtracting end-diastolic from end-systolic wall thickness. Dysfunctional segments were defined as segments with systolic wall thickening of <3 mm. The transmural extent of infarction was calculated by dividing the hyperenhanced area by the total area of the pre-defined segment. Segments with more than 50% hyperenhancement were considered segments with transmural enhancement.


Figure 1
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Example of CMR Images of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Examples of 3 patients after myocardial infarction, using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). (Left) Patient with a nontransmural subendocardial myocardial infarction (hyperenhanced region between white triangles). (Middle) Example of a transmural myocardial infarction without microvascular obstruction (hyperenhanced region between black triangles). (Right) Transmural infarction (between black, dotted triangles) with microvascular obstruction (hypoenhancement within the hyperenhanced region, white arrow).

 
Statistical analysis.   Values are reported as mean ± SD or median (25th to 75th percentile) for continuous variables and as frequency with percentage for categorical variables. For the comparison of continuous and categorical variables between anterior and nonanterior infarcts, the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test were used, as appropriate.

Correlations were calculated with simple linear and logistic regression analysis. To identify independent predictors of global and regional LV indexes, and size and extent of infarction, multivariable linear regression analysis was used. Because ST-segment resolution and residual ST-segment elevation may have important colinearity, multivariable linear regression analysis with a forward selection procedure was performed. The ST-segment resolution, residual ST-segment elevation, number of Q waves, and anterior MI entered the model if p < 0.10. Similar analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression for the relation with the presence of MVO.

All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Calculations were generated by SPSS software (version 15.0 for Windows, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Patient characteristics and angiographic and ECG data are listed in Table 1. Mean LVEDV was 99.4 ± 18.3 ml/m2, LVESV was 57.8 ± 16.9 ml/m2, and LVEF was 42.7 ± 8.6% in the total group of patients, with a mean number of 8.4 ± 3.2 dysfunctional segments. The mean total size of gadolinium-enhanced infarction was 16.6 ± 8.9% of LV mass, with a mean number of 3.2 ± 2.4 transmural enhanced segments. In 57.8% of the patients, there was presence of MVO on the LGE images. Patients with anterior MI (n = 114, 63%) had significantly worse LVEF, more dysfunctional segments, larger infarct size, and more segments with transmural enhancement than patients with nonanterior MI (p < 0.001 for all). There was no difference in median (25th to 75th percentile) symptom-to-balloon time between patients with anterior or nonanterior MI (2.6 h, 2.0 to 4.0 h vs. 3.5 h, 2.1 to 4.5 h, respectively, p = 0.10) or between patients with or without MVO (2.9 h, 2.0 to 4.5 h vs. 2.9 h, 2.0 to 4.3 h, respectively, p = 0.80).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Patient Characteristics and Angiographic and Electrocardiographic Data
 
ST-segment resolution.   The 12-lead ECGs were available for assessment of ST-segment resolution in 171 of 180 patients (2 left bundle branch block, 2 right bundle branch block, and 5 pre-procedural ECGs were missing or of poor technical quality). There was a moderate statistical relation for ST-segment resolution with LVEF and the number of dysfunctional segments (p < 0.05). The ST-segment resolution was also moderately associated with the number of transmural enhanced segments (p = 0.02) but not with either infarct size or the presence of MVO (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Relation Between the ECG and Post-Infarction Indexes

Univariable regression analysis of the relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution (A, D, and G), residual ST-segment elevation (B, E, and H), and the number of Q waves (C, F, and I), and left ventricular ejection fraction (A to C), the transmural extent of infarction (D to F), and microvascular obstruction (G to I) as assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance. ECG = electrocardiogram; MVO = microvascular obstruction.

 
Residual ST-segment elevation.   There were 178 of the 180 ECGs available for assessment of residual ST-segment elevation (2 left bundle branch block). There was a statistical association between residual ST-segment elevation and LVEDV, LVESV, LVEF, and the number of dysfunctional segments (p < 0.01). There was a stronger relationship with total infarct size, the number of segments with transmural enhancement, and the presence of MVO (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Number of Q waves.   All ECGs were available and interpretable for Q-wave assessment. The number of Q waves related moderately to LVEDV (p = 0.009), and there was a good correlation with LVESV, LVEF, and the number of dysfunctional segments (p < 0.001). A significant association was found with size and transmural extent of infarction (p < 0.001), but the number of Q waves did not statistically correlate with the presence of MVO (p = 0.054) (Fig. 2).

Predictive value of ECG measures.   Tables 2 and 3 Go show the predictive value of each ECG parameter with respect to myocardial function, size and extent of infarction, and microvascular injury. The strongest predictors of LVEF were residual ST-segment elevation and the number of Q waves in multivariable analysis. Additionally, the number of Q waves independently predicted infarct size and transmural extent, whereas residual ST-segment elevation was the single and best predictor of MVO presence. The ST-segment resolution is no longer associated with LV function or transmurality after adjustment for residual ST-segment elevation and the number of Q waves. Furthermore, anterior MI was a strong independent predictor of LVEF, the number of dysfunctional segments, infarct size, and the number of segments with transmural infarction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Predictive Value of Electrocardiographic Measures on Myocardial Function and Necrosis
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Predictive Value of Electrocardiographic Measures on Microvascular Obstruction
 
ECG in relation to angiography and infarct size.   There was no relation between incomplete Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade after primary PCI (defined as TIMI flow grade 1 to 2) and LVEF (β = –2.37, p = 0.22), the number of transmural enhanced segments (β = –0.005, p = 0.99), or the presence of MVO (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, 25th to 75th percentile: 0.7 to 4.4, p = 0.27). An impaired myocardial blush grading (MBG) (defined as MBG 0 to 1) correlated with LVEF (β = –4.06, p = 0.003) and with transmurality (β = 1.24, p = 0.001). Also, impaired MBG was associated with the presence of MVO (OR: 3.6, 25th to 75th percentile: 1.8 to 7.4, p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis of all angiographic and ECG parameters showed residual ST-segment elevation and the number of Q waves as only independent variables for prediction of LVEF and the number of Q waves for predicting transmurality. For predicting the presence of MVO, impaired MBG (OR: 2.7, 25th to 75th percentile: 1.3 to 5.7, p = 0.009) and residual ST-segment elevation of more than 10 mm (OR: 10.5, 25th to 75th percentile: 1.2 to 88.9, p = 0.03) were both independently associated with MVO presence in multivariable logistic regression analysis.

There was a strong association between gadolinium-enhanced infarct size and LVEF (β = –0.58, p < 0.001), transmurality (β = 0.24, p < 0.001), and MVO (β = 0.04, p < 0.001). After adjustment for infarct size in multivariable analysis, residual ST-segment resolution remained independently associated with LVEF (β = –1.81, p = 0.002) and the presence of MVO (β = 0.10, p = 0.006), and the number of Q waves with transmurality (β = 0.23, p = 0.012).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
The principal finding of this study in patients after successful PCI for acute ST-segment elevation MI was that residual ST-segment elevation and the number of Q waves on the post-procedural ECG are complementary in predicting myocardial function and necrosis. Residual ST-segment elevation, the number of Q waves, and anterior MI were the strongest predictors of LV function. Additionally, residual elevation was the single and best predictor of microvascular injury, whereas Q-wave count and anterior infarction best predicted infarct size and transmural extent of infarction.

The changes of the electrocardiographic ST-segment in patients with ST-segment elevation MI have been associated with patency of the infarct-related artery in multiple clinical studies (15,16). Although this is no misapprehension, an important percentage of the patients does not show normalization of the ST-segment after successful revascularization despite TIMI flow grade 3 (4) because of impaired reperfusion at the myocardial tissue level. This is caused by a multitude of processes, including tissue edema, platelet plugging, neutrophil adhesion, myonecrosis, and intracapillary red blood cell stasis, resulting in MVO, which is also known as the no-reflow phenomenon (17). Experimental and clinical studies have shown that MVO is common, and that it is associated with a higher incidence of LV remodeling, congestive heart failure, and death (18,19). Thus, the ST-segment early after PCI offers prognostic information by reflecting myocardial perfusion status rather than epicardial flow and predicts clinical outcome in patients with reperfused MI (3,4). The present study extends these findings by showing that persisting elevation of the ST-segment is strongly related to LV volumes and function and is strongly correlated with the presence of microvascular injury, which is essential information during hospitalization.

In line with previous studies, residual ST-segment elevation performed better as a predictive measure than ST-segment resolution (6,20). The ST-segment elevation in acute MI may have already partially normalized on admission because of the drastically improved infarct treatment, including heparin and aspirin during transfer to the tertiary center for primary PCI. Thus, the ECG before reperfusion therapy may underestimate the true amount of ST-segment elevation and consequently may affect its prognostic power. Residual ST-segment elevation may therefore better express reperfusion injury at the myocardial tissue level than ST-segment resolution.

Early work has reported that there is a relation between the presence of Q waves on the ECG and the transmural extent of infarction in chronic MI (21). Later, human autopsy studies suggested that this association was doubtful; however, much anatomical and clinical research has shown that the distinction of Q waves in patients with previous MI is useful for prognosis because its presence predicts larger infarcts and higher mortality (10,11,22). In a report by Tousek et al. (23), a relation was found between microvascular perfusion on myocardial contrast echocardiography and the extent of Q wave formation on the ECG after mechanical reperfused acute MI. Although echocardiography using myocardial contrast can be used to predict functional outcome after reperfused acute MI, it is not capable of differentiating between the presence or absence of transmural infarction in segments with reduced myocardial perfusion. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate the significance of the number of Q waves early after primary PCI in relation to myocardial function, and in particular, to study its relation between the extent of infarction and microvascular injury. The number of Q waves strongly predicted LV end-systolic volume, LVEF, and the number of dysfunctional segments, and was the strongest independent predictor on the ECG of infarct size and its transmural extent. There was no statistically significant relation with microvascular injury.

Another important difference between the results of this study and those of earlier studies assessing the predictive value of ECG measures in patients with acute MI is that both residual ST-segment elevation and the number of Q waves offered incremental information aside from angiographic measures and infarct size with respect to LV function, transmurality, and microvascular injury. Previous reports have shown that incomplete TIMI flow grade and impaired MBG predict worse clinical outcome and LV function (24,25). Although we found no statistical significant relation between incomplete TIMI flow grade and LV function in our study, impaired MBG correlated with LVEF, transmurality, and MVO. In multivariable analysis, ECG measures remained stronger predictors of LVEF and transmurality, and MBG was only predictive for the presence of MVO.

Methodological considerations.   Assessment of ECG measures was done semiquantitatively. Continuous ST-segment monitoring using automated analysis systems may have improved the evaluation of myocardial reperfusion over time (16). Also, addition of ST-segment depression may have further improved the pathophysiological understanding of the ECG and its prognostic impact (6,26), reflecting reciprocal ST-segment elevation, more extensive infarction, or additional ischemia beyond the infarct zone. In this study, however, we have evaluated a clinically applicable and generally available approach. Our findings cannot be generalized to all patients with acute MI because only patients with ST-segment elevation MI were included in the study with relatively large infarcts (elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band >10 times the upper limit of normal). Although these data suggest an incremental role for the number of Q waves in relation to LV function and infarction, it is unknown whether these results can be extrapolated to patients with acute MI without ST-segment elevation. Additionally, patients in whom revascularization was not successful, those treated conservatively, or those who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery for acute MI were not included in the study.

Clinical implications.   Because residual ST-segment elevation reflects myocardial function and no-reflow, whereas the number of Q waves relates to myocardial function and size/extent of infarction, both parameters offer complementary information for patients after reperfused acute MI beyond that provided by infarct size and angiography. Therefore, we believe that the readily available and simple ECG shortly after PCI may more specifically assist the physician's clinical decision making and risk stratification of patients after acute MI than currently known. Additionally, our findings may be relevant for selecting patients who may benefit from adjunctive therapeutic interventions (e.g., cell therapy) to limit functional deterioration and promote the repair of infarcted myocardium.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
We found that residual ST-segment elevation and the number of Q waves on the ECG shortly after PCI for acute MI have complementary predictive value on myocardial function, size and extent of infarction, and microvascular injury.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Paul R. Algra from the Department of Radiology and Dr. Victor A.W.M. Umans from the Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Alkmaar (Alkmaar, the Netherlands), for their contribution to the data acquisition and the patient group collection. The authors also thank the technicians and research nurses of the Cardiology and Radiology Departments of the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam), University Medical Center Groningen (Groningen), Medical Center Alkmaar (Alkmaar), and VU University Medical Center (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) for their skilled assistance.


    Footnotes
 
Dr. Nijveldt was supported by grant 2003B126 from The Netherlands Heart Foundation. This study was supported by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands (ICIN). Guerbet Nederland B. V. kindly provided the contrast agent used in this study. The first three authors contributed equally to this work.

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Robin Nijveldt, Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Email: r.nijveldt{at}vumc.nl).

Manuscript received March 24, 2008; revised manuscript received June 16, 2009, accepted June 25, 2009.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Muller JE, Maroko PR, Braunwald E. Evaluation of precordial electrocardiographic mapping as a means of assessing changes in myocardial ischemic injury Circulation 1975;52:16-27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Muller JE, Maroko PR, Braunwald E. Precordial electrocardiographic mapping. A technique to assess the efficacy of interventions designed to limit infarct size. Circulation 1978;57:1-18.[Free Full Text]
  3. Schroder R, Dissmann R, Bruggemann T, et al. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a simple but strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:384-391.[Abstract]
  4. van 't Hof AW, Liem A, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F, Zwolle Myocardial infarction Study Group Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiogram after successful reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction Lancet 1997;350:615-619.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction Circulation 2007;116:2634-2653.[Free Full Text]
  6. De Luca G, Maas AC, Suryapranata H, et al. Prognostic significance of residual cumulative ST-segment deviation after mechanical reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Am Heart J 2005;150:1248-1254.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Nijveldt R, Beek AM, Hirsch A, et al. Functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: a comparison between angiography, electrocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of microvascular injury J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:181-189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Costantini C, et al. Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction Eur Heart J 2005;26:667-674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. Non-Q wave myocardial infarction: recent changes in occurrence and prognosis—a community-wide perspective Am Heart J 1987;113:273-279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Nicod P, Gilpin E, Dittrich H, et al. Short- and long-term clinical outcome after Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in a large patient population Circulation 1989;79:528-536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Aguirre FV, Younis LT, Chaitman BR, et al. Early and 1-year clinical outcome of patients' evolving non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results from The TIMI II Study. Circulation 1995;91:2541-2548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:210-247.[Free Full Text]
  13. Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1003-1011.[Free Full Text]
  14. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association Circulation 2002;105:539-542.[Free Full Text]
  15. Clemmensen P, Ohman EM, Sevilla DC, et al. Changes in standard electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation predictive of successful reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1407-1411.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Klootwijk P, Langer A, Meij S, et al. Non-invasive prediction of reperfusion and coronary artery patency by continuous ST segment monitoring in the GUSTO-I trial Eur Heart J 1996;17:689-698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog J Clin Invest 1974;54:1496-1508.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the ‘no reflow’ phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996;93:223-228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction Circulation 1998;97:765-772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. McLaughlin MG, Stone GW, Aymong E, et al. Prognostic utility of comparative methods for assessment of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1215-1223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Prinzmetal M, Shaw Jr CM, Maxwell MH, et al. Studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. VI. The depolarization complex in pure subendocardial infarction; role of the subendocardial region in the normal electrocardiogram. Am J Med 1954;16:469-489.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Moon JC, De Arenaza DP, Elkington AG, et al. The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:554-560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tousek P, Krupicka J, Orban M, Firschke C. Correlation between ECG and myocardial perfusion after mechanical reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction Int J Cardiol 2006;107:107-111.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Piana RN, Paik GY, Moscucci M, et al. Incidence and treatment of ‘no-reflow' after percutaneous coronary intervention Circulation 1994;89:2514-2518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. van 't Hof AW, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F, Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade Circulation 1998;97:2302-2306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lembo NJ, Starling MR, Dell'Italia LJ, Crawford MH, Chaudhuri TK, O'Rourke RA. Clinical and prognostic importance of persistent precordial (V1-V4) electrocardiographic ST segment depression in patients with inferior transmural myocardial infarction Circulation 1986;74:56-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Electrocardiographic Measures of Myocardial Function and Necrosis
Galen S. Wagner and Nina Hakacova
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2009 2: 1195-1197. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
G. S. Wagner and N. Hakacova
Electrocardiographic Measures of Myocardial Function and Necrosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 1195 - 1197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nijveldt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nijveldt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Zijlstra, F.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link