Advertisement
top banner image  

topleft corner image     top right corner image
 
ACCF/AHA Clinical Guidelines and Statements

CME logo image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

JACC Homepage JACC Interventions Homepage
Still not a subscriber to JACC Imaging or JACC Interventions?

take action
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

acc links
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

jacc imaging image
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

     top nav image

     

J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 2010; 3:152-154, doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.005
© 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, S. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, S. V.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Editorial Comment

Straining to Justify Strain Measurement*

Orlando P. Simonetti, PhD, Subha V. Raman, MD*

The Ohio State University, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio

Key Words: cardiomyopathy • cardiac magnetic resonance • myocardial strain • myocardial mechanics • dystrophin


When thus the heart is in a vein Of tender thought, the simplest strain Can touch it with peculiar power.—Sir Thomas Moore (1)

A broad array of cardiac imaging research and technique development has been deployed in the quest to define the earliest myocardial changes of cardiomyopathy so that earlier detection may afford more timely institution of therapy and improved outcomes. Recognition that high-resolution measures of myocardial deformation can be abnormal before global contractile dysfunction has further fueled development of techniques such as speckle tracking, myocardial tagging, displacement-encoded imaging, and vector velocity imaging. Nonetheless, one must strain to find clinicians who rely on any of these techniques for routine management decisions despite more than 20 years of technical refinement since the first myocardial tagging methods were described by Zerhouni et al. (2) and Axel and Dougherty (3). Rather, these approaches remain on the fringe of care, limited to the realm of interesting techniques seeking clinical relevance.

In an era when imaging lies squarely in the cross-hairs of cost containment and health care reform, the reasons for this failure of strain measurement to gain any meaningful clinical use must be examined. Is it inconsistency in data acquisition? Does the burden of time-consuming post-processing limit practical applicability? Have we not met the threshold of evidence required to demonstrate that detection of subclinical strain abnormalities leads to tangible improvements in outcomes? Or does contemporary heart failure practice cling too fervently to traditional hemodynamic, structural, and functional measures to incorporate new approaches? In light of more than 5.7 million Americans with heart failure who face a 20% 1-year mortality rate, improvements in methods of early diagnosis and treatment are clearly still needed.

In this issue of iJACC, Hor et al. (4) present a new technique for measuring peak systolic circumferential strain ({varepsilon}cc) from routinely acquired cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images. The application of feature-tracking algorithms, designed originally for echocardiographic image analysis, to CMR cine images is a novel approach with potential advantages over existing methods. Such a technique would eliminate the need for additional time-consuming scans designed specifically for strain measurement such as tagging, displacement encoding, and phase-velocity imaging. Additionally, the described method of CMR feature tracking is rapid and automated. Their technique showed good agreement with strain measurement using tagged cine, a separate acquisition technique not routinely performed but historically the standard for CMR-based strain analysis that has been validated against sonomicrometry. Reproducibility among observers was also good, although data on the same observers' analyses of tagged cine data would have been useful for comparison. When applied to cine images from healthy controls and patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the resulting strain measurements discriminated among groups with progressive myocardial disease. A most useful finding was that feature tracking–derived {varepsilon}cc in DMD patients showed abnormalities even in the setting of preserved systolic function, offering hope for earlier detection of inevitable cardiomyopathy in these patients.

Although the authors claim that circumferential, longitudinal, and radial tissue velocity; displacement; strain; and strain rate could all be computed by feature tracking, only {varepsilon}cc averaged over a single midventricular slice was reported. The accuracy and reliability of regional measures of strain in multiple directions, and their applicability to diastolic strain measurement, remain unknown. The mix of acquisition techniques, including 3-T versus 1.5-T and breath-holding versus free-breathing, leaves some uncertainty as to applicability for a given acquisition mode. Covariate analysis by field strength and cine sequence would help address this before clinical implementation.

The endocardial feature tracking approach was not without limitations. Tagging-based {varepsilon}cc measurement discriminated between younger and older DMD patients, yet feature tracking–based {varepsilon}cc could not detect this difference. One would expect the difference to be real as DMD-associated cardiomyopathy advances with age. There was also a slight underestimation of {varepsilon}cc by feature tracking versus tagged cine analysis, and the difference between techniques increased as one progressed through patient groups with more advanced cardiomyopathy. This divergence warrants further investigation, even if the greatest utility for strain measurement in this population may be in earlier detection when left ventricular ejection fraction is normal.

A potential explanation for reduced sensitivity and slightly lower strain values is that the feature tracking algorithm tracks the deformation of only the endocardial border, not the epicardium, potentially losing transmural information captured in tag grids that span the entire thickness of the ventricular wall. Mechanistically, this fits with the pathology of DMD-associated cardiomyopathy, which is characterized by epicardial injury by ex vivo histopathology and demonstrable in vivo with late post-gadolinium imaging (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Late Post-Gadolinium Imaging of Dystrophin-Associated Cardiomyopathy

The typical late gadolinium enhancement pattern seen in dystrophin-associated cardiomyopathy (left) involves the lateral epicardium, similar to myocarditis. Applying thresholding to display pixels with signal intensity 2 SDs above the mean of nonenhancing myocardium is shown (right). LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

 
Abnormal strain has been shown to precede systolic dysfunction in pre-clinical models of DMD-associated cardiomyopathy (5). Although diastolic strain data were not presented in this work, one could envision that the proposed feature-tracking approach would offer a more robust calculation of diastolic strain using standard cine data versus techniques such as tagging and displacement encoding, which may not be capable of measuring strain across the entire cardiac cycle due to T1 relaxation. However, the authors do point out that this is less problematic at 3-T due to the inherently longer tissue T1 values.

Assuming that we now have a technique for routine, reproducible, and relatively painless myocardial strain measurement, what further evidence is needed to justify clinical use? Software advances that provide features such as visually appealing strain maps in place of manual comparison of segmental strain data would be a welcome and critical step before there can be wider adoption of strain measurement. Clinical trials have already shown that, using global left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography to guide initiation of therapy, treatment of DMD patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors limits initiation and progression of cardiomyopathy (6). Prospective studies randomizing patients to therapeutic decision making with or without strain measurement may be required (7). Extension of studies such as this to include patient outcomes and appropriate multivariate analysis to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness and added value of strain measurement to existing clinical, structural, and functional measurements will also be essential. The high morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure give clinicians little time for techniques that reveal subtleties without proven impact on outcomes. Conversely, those that afford more accurate diagnosis and precision in assigning prognosis hold the promise of earlier institution of appropriate treatment to reduce death and disability. This would seem to be particularly true in the management of patients with cardiomyopathies, in which early institution of therapies such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers before end-stage heart failure has set in has repeatedly proven beneficial across the etiologic spectrum. This work has made a small but important step forward in realizing a clinical role for myocardial strain measurement in the evaluation of cardiomyopathy.


    Footnotes
 
Drs. Simonetti and Raman receive research support from Siemens.

* Editorials published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging reflect the view of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging or the American College of Cardiology. Back

* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Subha V. Raman, The Ohio State University, 473 West 12th Avenue, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43210 (Email: Raman.1{at}osu.edu).


    REFERENCES
 Top
 REFERENCES
 

  1. "Song" from Evenings in Greece, Sir Thomas Moore (1779–1852). The Poetical Works of Thomas Moore. Philadelphia: Porter & Coates; 1876.
  2. Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, Yang A, Shapiro EP. Human heart: tagging with MR imaging—a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion Radiology 1988;169:59-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Axel L, Dougherty L. MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization Radiology 1989;171:841-845.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hor KN, Gottliebson WM, Carson C, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2010;3:144-151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Li W, Liu W, Zhong J, Yu X. Early manifestation of alteration in cardiac function in dystrophin deficient mdx mouse using 3D CMR tagging J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Duboc D, Meune C, Lerebours G, Davaux J, Vaksmann G, Becane H. Effect of perindopril on the onset and progression of left ventricular dysfunction in Duchenne muscular dystrophy J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:855-857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Douglas PS, Taylor A, Bild D, et al. Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:339-348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking for Strain Calculation With Harmonic Phase Imaging Analysis
Kan N. Hor, William M. Gottliebson, Christopher Carson, Erin Wash, James Cnota, Robert Fleck, Janaka Wansapura, Piotr Klimeczek, Hussein R. Al-Khalidi, Eugene S. Chung, D. Woodrow Benson, and Wojciech Mazur
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2010 3: 144-151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, S. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simonetti, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by Raman, S. V.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Advertisement
 
   
 
home link current link search link archive link topics link cardiology careers link