JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume 11, Issue 11, November 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.05.004
PDF Article
Original Research

Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease
The ReASSESS Study

Niels Peter Rønnow Sand, Karsten Tange Veien, Søren Steen Nielsen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Pia Larsen, Allan Johansen, Søren Hess, Lone Deibjerg, Majed Husain, Anders Junker, Kristian Korsgaard Thomsen, Allan Rohold and Lisette Okkels Jensen

Table 5

Table 5

Association Between Size of Reversible Perfusion Defects by SPECT and FFR (n = 139)

Size of Reversible Perfusion DefectPatientsFFR ≤0.80
No reversible perfusion defect11334 (30)
Small reversible perfusion defect73 (43)
Moderate reversible perfusion defect118 (73)
Large reversible perfusion defect88 (100)

Values are n or n (%).

Test for trend p ≤ 0.001.

SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography; other abbreviations as in Table 3.

      View article

    Advertisement