Can Lung Comets Be Counted as “Objects”?
Author + information
- Gino Soldati, MD⁎ (soldatigino{at}yahoo.it),
- Roberto Copetti, MD and
- Sara Sher, MD
- ↵⁎“Valle del Serchio” General Hospital, 55032 Castelnuovo Garfagnana, Lucca, Italy
We have read with interest the study carried out by Mallamaci et al. (1) in iJACC. The authors evaluate pulmonary vascular congestion in a group of patients in chronic dialysis through a score derived from the number of ultrasound lung comets in the anterior chest regions (2–5).
No doubt exists that a “wet lung” will present a proportionally larger number of comets, reflecting the increase in its extravascular lung water. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema typically manifests with ultrasound lung comets that are initially more evident at lung bases and then extend to the middle and superior fields in relation to the increase in capillary venous pressure.
However, the hypothesis proposed by the authors (1), that lung comets originate from the subpleural interlobular edematous septa, is less convincing. First, the 7-mm distance observed between the comets does not correspond to anatomic observations, which show a variable distance from 10 to 30 mm between the interlobular septa (6,7). Second, we have demonstrated that analogous artifacts might be observed when insonating a foam object, in the absence of identifiable structures (8). Third, from the biophysical point of view, reverberations on subpleural interlobular septa (as proposed in Figure 1 of the article [1]) are unlikely as interlobular septa to project from the pleural surface at right angles and certainly are not parallel to it, as would be necessary to create repetitive specular reflections or “transducer reverberations” (9). Finally, in our experience, the creation of ultrasound lung comets is an angle- and movement-dependent phenomenon.
Insonation of a Porous, Wet, Polyurethane Phantom With a 6.6-Mhz Linear Probe Through a Distantiator
This model generates artifacts similar to those observed in lung ultrasonography through the residual aeration distributed in impedent clusters surrounded by fluid (personal unpublished observations). (A) Image generated through a scan perpendicular to the surface (90°): coalescent comet tails are generated. (B) Same scanning plane obtained with probe at 45°: a smaller number of comet tail artifacts are observed.
This is evident from clinical practice and from the analysis of a porous and wet polyurethane phantom insonated at 90° and 45° (unpublished data). Insonation at an angle is less capable of producing artifacts analogous to the ones observed in the pathologic lung (Fig. 1), supporting the hypothesis that comets are the expression of random microfocal reverberations or “internal reverberations.”
Increasing degrees of lung congestion leads to the formation of increasing concentrations of lung comets up to their coalescence (Fig. 2). We believe counting these artifacts to be imprecise in a tissue that is more-or-less porous. Furthermore, it is unlikely that a numerical estimate of such comets, which are not correlated to identifiable structures (as septi) but are based on an angle- and movement-dependent geometry, could be used as an instrument for classification of pathology. Instead, we believe that a better physical knowledge of the acoustic phenomena produced by porous and aerated tissues is necessary to correctly interpret images of lung pathology that are nothing more than “errors” of interpretation of real signals by the echographic machine.
Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Same thoracic scan obtained with 2 different probes: a 5-MHz convex probe (A) and a 3.5-MHz sector probe (B). Comet tail artifacts are confluent (white lung), and the result is difficult to count, especially during respiratory movements only evident in real-time images.
- American College of Cardiology Foundation
