PRrospEctive Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT PerfuSion Imaging in Stable Coronary ArtEry DiSeaSe
The ReASSESS Study
Niels Peter Rønnow Sand, Karsten Tange Veien, Søren Steen Nielsen, Bjarne Linde Nørgaard, Pia Larsen, Allan Johansen, Søren Hess, Lone Deibjerg, Majed Husain, Anders Junker, Kristian Korsgaard Thomsen, Allan Rohold and Lisette Okkels Jensen
Direct comparisons between SPECT and FFRCT are shown for both the entire population and for subgroups of patients with different stenosis severity. For each cell, the number in first row represents the actual number of patients with the specific combination of SPECT and FFRCT test results; numbers in second row indicates the number of patients (n [%]) with an FFR value ≤0.80. MPI = myocardial perfusion imaging; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.